In 1987, Newt co-sponsored the Fairness Doctrine, which was thankfully vetoed by Ronald Reagan.
Jerry Doyle lays on the smack - most satisfying with bonus info on Newt.
Jerry Doyle lays on the smack - most satisfying with bonus info on Newt.
Where the Sphere of Domesticity is Fired Up! And the Memory Hole Gets Stopped Up!
Very spooky... how can GOP voters fall for this guy? I just don't get it, I guess that republicans are just as ill-informed as the other side. Very sad.
ReplyDeleteIt would appear that the dialectic process has captured many thought victims. A lot of people choose to be ill-informed when information challenges their paradigms.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree. "Ill-informed" when it comes to choosing an 'R' statist-progressive Newt or Mitt puts us in the same place that Obama (and GWB) have.
ReplyDeleteAnother newtism I didn't know about. I will update my new post "Why I don't Want Newt for President."
ReplyDeleteIt might surprise you all that the Fairness Doctrine was originally pushed and put into place by Republicans during the Red Scares following World War II.
ReplyDeleteFrom the time it was instituted, until it was phased out, Democrats were largely against it, and only got on board with keeping it once the FCC stopped enforcing it completely in the mid-1980's.
In fact, last August the Obama administration quietly put the issue to rest altogether by removing the language from the Federal Register, making it all but impossible for reintroducing the Fairness Doctrine, which he has repeatedly stated he is not interested in doing, to begin with.
That doesn't surprise me much, as I know that there is only one party in the United States, the Bankster Party. The Fairness Doctrine was useful for their purposes for a time and I guess there is no point in it with the internet and all.
DeleteNow they are agitating for the internet kill switch, and when I say they, I mean the oligarchy.
Thanks for the bipartisan perspective.