Some Iran Backstory

Found this great piece at Lew Rockwell by Robert Parry entitled "How Two Elections Changed America" brimming with details and puzzle pieces to put together. You'll recognize many of the characters you've come to read about here, which makes it that much more interesting:

35 Facts about the Gutting of Industrial America

Via the Economic Collapse, which is becoming a top spot on many people's internet menu. Check out these facts and consider carefully your Christmas list. As one mom friend commented in a recent email to the group, "do you really need more cheap foreign-made junk in your house?"

Herman Cain Caught Lying

This is the digital age, people. If you say something on a national radio program, it will be taped and archived, and probably You-tubed. This is why I try to be very careful with my facts on here, because I don't like being made a fool or damaging my credibility by jumping the gun. I'm not saying it can't or won't happen, but I try to take everything with a grain of salt.

There was a debate last night held by the Bloomberg channel, owned by multi-billionare globalist Michael Bloomberg, moderated by Bilderburg attendee Charlie Rose, and financially sponsored by Peter Peterson, former president of the Council on Foreign Relations. Get the picture? This debate was practically in globalist HQ. But former Kansas City Federal Reserve Chairman Herman Cain was woefully unprepared to answer an inevitable question from Ron Paul, arch enemy of fiat money and the unconstitutional counterfeiters at the Fed, which went thusly:

Breaking Down Planned - Opolis

Welcome iOwnTheWorld readers - look around 'cause my blog is like a curiosity boutique - lots of info you won't find blogged on anywhere else!

Update/Correction: Should read 3000 gallons of water below - I was going off memory when I was writing this up.

Consider the following three videos: If you don't have the stomach to watch them all, I completely understand. Just watch one and skip down to the analysis, which I'm sure you'll find quite interesting.

You would almost believe that this is some sort of farce, a put-on. So I did some digging on what exactly the Forum for the Future is and who is funding it. If you've been a regular reader, then you know by now that the super-duper rich elites work their wiles on the world through the Foundations as revealed in the Reece Committee of 1953 and written about by Rene Wormser. This Forum for the Future is yet another of the "nonprofits"  that seeks to collectivize society.

According to their latest financial report, this UK based NGO has recently opened a New York office with the financial backing of the Tides Foundation and has raised over 200,000 pounds for the 2010 fiscal year.  They brag of the following accomplishments:

We continued to influence business thinking, contributing to ambitious strategies - such as Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan and PepsiCo’s sustainable agriculture goals - that set the benchmark for corporations globally.

We ran a number of cutting edge projects, launching the UK’s first eco-rating scheme for mobile phones with O2, helping eBay make its business model even more sustainable, and trialling ‘disruptive innovation’ in the energy sector.

 One thing I noticed on the back of my Unilever corporation Suave shampoo bottle while showering was a little factoid. Did you know that you can save up to $150 a year or 3000 gallons of water by turning the water off while you condition and shampoo? That's right, you turn the water on to get your hair wet, turn it off to later and back on to rinse. They would prefer you not repeat. So who is behind Unilever, one of the biggest corporate sponsors of Forum for the Future? Well here's the map for Unilever that shows their board members and past and present officers along with the other corporations and nonprofits that these Unilever execs are members of. Isn't it interesting to see how they are connected?

link to explorable map

When you look at their financial statement, you find that only 100 pounds was donated by individuals the Lion's share of their money comes from corporate donors. But wouldn't the green agenda be bad for corporations? Not if the corporations giving the money has got it rigged so that the green agenda benefits them.

Forum for the Future sources of income 2010

 Getting backed to the Planned-opolis videos wherein the propoganda is such to get you ready for having your job chosen for you, your travel restricted, your dwelling place restricted, your food restricted, etc. At the end of the videos, you will find that they were produced as a joint project of the Embarq Corporation, the FIA Foundation, and Vodaphone. Let's look at these three entities and see who they're connected to and why they would want to fund such collectivist propoganda.

If you click on over to the end of their 2010 financial statement, you will find a listing of their corporate partners, which is a humongous list of Fortune 500 companies.

First up, the Embarq Corporation is a spinoff of Sprint/Nextell formed in 2006. As you can see from it's map, whose link is not agreeing with me today, the officers of this corporation are also well-connected:

Embarq Corporation

The CEO is Dan Hesse, who also was CEO of Sprint/Nextel and AT&T Wireless. He sits/sat on the Boards of Nokia and Vanify Fair (my source for cheap khakis). Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs during the Clinton administration, William Owens is currently Chairman of the Board. Ol' Dick Gephardt is on the Board as well as on the board of nine other big corporations, which I didn't expand for some reason? The rest of the gang includes Peter C. Brown, CEO of AMC Entertainment, Steven Davis, CEO of Bob Evans farms, John P. Mullen, CEO of DHL (aka day and a half late!), Dinesh C. Paliwal, CEO of Harman International, Stephanie Shern, a lawyer and board member of three other corporations, and Laurie Siegel, an exec at Tyco.

If you click on embarq.com, you will be taken to the website of Centurylink internet. They acquired Embarq in 2009 in a tax free transaction. Admiral William Owens, mentioned above became chairman of the board. CenturyLink recently acquired Qwest Communications. What we've got here is a change in names, but the players are still the same. On Centurylink's website, they're all about the phony carbon footprint/offset bullcrap.

Next Up, what in the world is the FIA Foundation? According to their website,

The FIA Foundation is an independent UK registered charity which manages and supports an international programme of activities promoting road safety, environmental protection and sustainable mobility, as well as funding specialist motor sport safety research.

The FIA Foundation was established in 2001 with a donation of $300 million made by the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), the non-profit federation of motoring organisations and the governing body of world motor sport.

The FIA Foundation is an NGO in Roster Consultative Status with the Economic & Social Council of the United Nations and a regular participant in the Working Party on Traffic Safety and the World Forum on Harmonisation of Vehicle Standards at the UN Economic Commission for Europe, and is a leading participant in the UN Global Road Safety Collaboration. The Foundation works with a range of international agencies including the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme on road safety and environmental issues.

 Supporters include Mexican President Calderon, British Prime Minister David Cameron, NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, UN Secretary General Moon, Nelson Mandela, the whole cast of characters. So repubmom, do you want children to die in the streets? Are you some evil person against road safety? What's your problem anyway? My problem is that they're using something everyone can agree on, like not being run down in the streets, to cloak their real agenda, control of transportation. It's one of the oldest tyrannical tricks in the playbook. The fact that the WHO, World Bank and the UN are the biggest players in this foundation tells you all you need to know.

Lastly, we move on to the Vodaphone corporation, where you will find a sustainability section all about keeping a low carbon footprint, blah blah blah. Vodaphone is a big wireless phone company in Europe and parts of Asia and Africa. In the Egyptian uprising, or whatever you want to call it, Vodaphone cut off a lot of dissenters saying that they had to do what Mubarak told them. I believe that there's a lot of funny business going on with Arabic countries - I sure don't believe what I'm told there. Anyway, the CEO is a Mr. Vittorio Colao who got his MBA at Harvard Business and then went on to work at Morgan Stanley in London. For those of you who've been following my Wall Street & the Bolsheviks series, let me pause a minute and..

Ok, now I can continue. He then went on to McKinsey and Co, a global management bankster firm, after which he got into an Italian wireless company, which became Vodophone Italy and eventually became CEO of the whole Vodaphone corporation in 2008. So what? Well what I'm trying to do here is establish who's doing what behind the scenes. When I get on a names database, I find influential people on corporations I've never heard of funding foundations I've never heard of who are writing policy that none of us are aware of until our esteemed legislators have already passed it. Get me? I'm not saying that all of these people are pure evil, but there is something horribly wicked brewing in the details. You will not find glowing accolades of the power of the individual on the websites of these foundations or corporations,  just how the individual can add to the group.

“No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.”

 --Voltaire

Well, I'm off to take a long luxurious shower while I still can!

Update: Just forgot to tie this in a nice neat package for you. Agenda 21 totally ties into all this. Well, I take these people's cute little videos and raise you this informational Agenda 21 featuring Henry Lamb:

Time Magazine Attacks the Constitution

If you haven't seen this, go take a look, be outraged, come back and I'll give you the backstory.

The managing editor of Time is Richard Stengel and he owns the byline to their bullcrap Constitution story. It's ironic that Mr. Stengel is the CEO of an Orwellian NGO called the National Constitution Center. You better believe its one of those revisionist organizations designed to twist the meaning of words. Here is the map that reveals who the trustees and honorary members. You will find many of our Supreme Justices and a who's who list of collectivists on both the left and right.

link to interactive map

The Mockingbird Media continues its attempt to demoralize us. If you are unfamiliar with demoralization, then you must not have read my most excellent and thorough series of posts of the Subversion Process. I highly recommend you check it out. The fact that they would put a shredded Constitution on the front page with a such a wry title means they're just telling you what they think of it. Reminds me of the famous Henry Kissinger quote,

The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
---New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973

The good news is that no one reads Time magazine and if Drudge hadn't put it up, most of us would have never known..

John Wheeler III - What happened?

Here's the run-down on Mr. Wheeler:

• Veitnam Veteran, West Point Grad
• Worked under Reagan to get the Vietnam Veterans Leadership Program
• Worked under Bush Sr. creating the Earth Conservation Corps for poor kids
• authored 1st Biological and Chemical Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual
• on the Red Integrated Strategic Operational Plan Team to test the Single Integrated Operational Plan
• Chairman of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund
• Chairman and CEO of M.A.D.D.
• Special Counsel to the Chairman and CEO for the turnaround of Macy's
• helped launch the Jed Foundation, Support our Aging Religious, and helping deaf children get cochlear implants 
• Has a law degree from Yale 1975
• defense contractor and trustee of the Mitre Corporation
• possessed the highest level of security clearences
• was found wandering around and "out of it" two days before his body was found in a landfill.

Bio info from Cryptogon, which has been blocked in the UK, by the way. The Mitre Corporation, which has contracts with the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the IRS, and the FAA.

From the WSJ

Wheeler’s house in New Castle was dark Monday night and no one answered the door. Yellow police evidence tape was stretched across two wooden chairs in the kitchen, where several wooden floorboards were missing.”

So here's what I did for the MITRE Corporation, who possesses the very first .org domain name, given in 1985.

link

So you've got to wonder what was he working on and/or who did he upset? Unlike many people, I won't speculate, because I don't have enough information to form an opinion. We only have just a few of the puzzle pieces. Is there anyone who is a military-industrial complex buff who has a better clue as to what happened with poor Mr. Wheeler?

Meet Your Elites: Crispen Tickell

I had never heard of this guy until I came across this James Dilingpole column I found at Lew Rockwell. It is by a guest poster Ishmael2009, and bills Crispen Tickell as the man who invented global warming. Mr. Tickell wrote the 1977 book Climactic Change and World Affairs in which he connects climate change and overpopulation. At the time, it was global cooling that was all the rage, but it doesn't matter because the human race is the target of the elites. Here is an excerpt:

We are, he believes, “a malignant maladaption in the corpus of living organisms, and behave and reproduce like a virus out of control” (2). We are “infected tissue in the organism of life” (3). “More than ever,” he writes, “humans can be regarded like certain species of ant” (5).The only relief from this that Tickell sees on the horizon is that “it is hard to believe that there will be anything like current or future human numbers in their present urban concentrations or elsewhere. Whether weeded out by warfare, disease, deteriorating conditions of life, or other disasters, numbers are likely to fall drastically. We must, I believe, expect some breakdowns in human society before the end of this century with unforeseeable outcomes” (4). That’ll teach us to pollute his nice clean world!

This dovetails with the previous post where we see that collectivists don't see the beauty of the individual, each uniquely created by God, but as a horde of groups and subgroups to be controlled and manipulated. Who else hates the human race this much or more? Oh, yes..

Get the picture? This guy is part of the founding families of the new world order, his great-great grandfather being T.H. Huxley himself.  One aspect of the elites I like to examine is their religious and moral beliefs. How convenient Mr. Tickell put up this interview about that very subject.

So you took instruction and became a Catholic, observing Catholic yourself.
Only for a very short time. I remember that the Jesuit who instructed me who was a well-known person called Father Martindale, whenever I came up against great difficulty he would put his hand upon mine and say 'Have faith my child, have faith.' But after a bit I realised that wasn't enough, and I didn't actually spend very long in the Catholic Church, because I was uncertain about its whole intellectual structure, and I still am.
Where did the doubts creep in then? Was this to do with fraternizing with the chimpanzees? (Laughs)
(Laughs) No. I just thought it was a very, very unlikely tale, the Christian tale - it seems to me that you're piling improbability upon improbability. And it goes back much more than people I think realize, to the extremely unlikely story of the Fall of Man. Because if Adam and Eve had not fallen, or if symbolically people had not learnt what sin was about, then you don't need a Redeemer, and you don't need all the rest of the apparatus. And so a lot of it goes back to the Fall. And when I became interested in anthropology, this seemed to me an extremely improbable phenomenon, because I see humans as being like any other primate, gradually moving in a certain direction with evidently mutations taking place, and gradually becoming aware of philosophy and understanding and language and art and all the rest of it. But I don't see anything like a fall. If you don't have a fall, you don't need a redeemer. If you don't need a redeemer, then what is this nonsense about, about having to be sacrificed on the cross for humanity? Again, you then get into the question of was ... Jesus God, or wasn't He? And it seems to me again it's an extremely unlikely tale that He ever was. I've always wanted all my life, to sit down with Him and have a good conversation.

You won't be sitting down and the conversation will be one-sided. He thinks humans are just monkeys, I guess his great-grandpa would be proud. Of course, this line of thinking makes culling humans morally justifiable, and we saw that with the Georgia Guidestones someone out there wants a lot of humans dead.

Isn't the point about Christianity that it, it's the unlikeliness of the tale that makes it the great faith it is?
Well I don't think so is the answer - I simply cannot believe this extraordinary heap of beliefs. And when you compare it with other beliefs and other religions as I think we all have to do, you realize that in many respects, Christianity is one of the most improbable of the lot. It's very interesting - how can people believe all this stuff? How did people believe the other things that they believe? I think the human mind is an infinitely flexible instrument which is capable of taking on almost any set of beliefs - sometimes you dress them up in reason afterwards - but the emotional reasons behind any religion are the most important, and I think the rationalization that takes place is, or is not improbable or implausible - and I'm afraid Christianity is among the most implausible.

If I'm going to believe in a God powerful enough to create the universe, then why would it be too hard to believe what He did in a Book which He wrote objectively explaining it to you? Apparently this concept is too hard for this poor, unregenerate man.

And did you, how did you fill the, the gap that was left then, as, as a young person you'd been a serving Christian. Did you feel a, a lack of an explanation or ideology? And indeed, where does Christianity sit now in your world view?
I think it's a system of belief that I respect in the same way as I respect other systems of belief, and I find it a very interesting subject. I find it's rather enjoyable to discuss it with people. You'd be surprised how few priests and other advocates of Christianity are in fact willing to get down to the intellectual foundations and have a look at them, because they don't like doing it. But filling a gap - I didn't really feel a great gap, because I think the most important thing that we have is life itself, and when I start to look at the improbability of life and its manifestations since the very beginnings probably 4 billion years ago, I find that of such interest, that I feel very much at one with living things wherever they may be.

He derides Christianity as not being intellectual and an emotional religion, which is just what the devil would say, wouldn't he? He speaks in opposite land where up is down and wrong is right. This statement is ludicrous given that it was the church that preserved the knowledge of the ancient world, it was Christian men determined to show God's order of the universe through scientific discovery that made the modern world possible. The rationality of a God outside of ourselves who instead of snapping His fingers and changing His Creation on a whim, which He is within His right to do, plays by His own set of rules. He is orderly, reasonable, and just. His Book has been preserved through the centuries unchanged as the Dead Sea Scrolls have proved. In it, the God of the universe describes the beginning, middle, and end of human history and His plan for it. The gobblegook spouted by Mr. Tickell is what is unrational-- just as God said would happen in the last days:


For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.


--Romans 1:18-25


Have pity on these elites who live in such spiritual darkness that they don't even realize that they are in a horrible trap. The fact that God has put the world into a deep freeze with these people promoting global warming shows how they are like gnats to Him. These people will ultimately never succeed in their plans because God is sovereign and in control. I'm reminded of what God said in Genesis 15:19:

 ...for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.

God is waiting for the resevoir of His wrath to be filled. Every abortion, every broken home, every blasphemy, every two-bit scheme like AGW puts a drop into His wrath bucket. The time will come when it will be filled and like a threatening parent, that really will be IT. Game. Over. Man. Those who mock Him with their stupid assertions that a God who purports to have created the universe wouldn't be able to do the math on human reproduction and the surface area of the earth- are in for a rougher time than we mundanes. Pray for Crispin Tickell, as he is lost without hope, and is not above using deceit and trickery to push eugenics on the world's population. 

Wikileaks: Media Newspeak Hysteria

Vox Day has written my thoughts exactly:

And the lunacy of Government Newspeak. We have truly reached a point of no return if the provision of accurate information to the people about what their supposedly democratic government is doing is equated with terrorism by their so-called leaders:

The incoming chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee says WikiLeaks should be officially designated as a terrorist organization. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the panel's presumptive next head, asked the Obama administration today to "determine whether WikiLeaks could be designated a foreign terrorist organization," putting the group in the same company as Al Qaeda and Aum Shinrikyo, the Japanese cult that released deadly sarin gas on the Tokyo subway.

"WikiLeaks appears to meet the legal criteria" of a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, King wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reviewed by CNET. He added: "WikiLeaks presents a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States."

If WikiLeaks meets the legal criteria of a "U.S.-designated terrorist organization" then so does Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. Governments always want to operate in the dark and keep their subjects in ignorance, which is why Julian Assange should not be assailed by the American people, he should be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, regardless of whatever his motivations in making all of this information available to the public might be.

WikiLeaks is nothing more or less than a technological blow for American freedom. Assange is no traitor; the accusation doesn't even make sense considering that he has absolutely no connection with the United States. But it should come as no surprise to the readers of this blog that the verbal attack against the organization is being led by one of those freedom-loving Republicans.

Moreover, the crocodile tears of those in the media who fear that the release of information to the public will "get people killed" is absolutely ludicrous given their support for the ongoing military occupations that have killed hundreds of thousands more people than any number of leaks possibly could. In fact, to the extent that WikiLeaks permits Americans to force an end to their leaders' pointless and unpopular wars, it will almost certainly save lives. After all, when one considers that numerous American leaders have waxed bellicose about the need to go to war to prevent Iran getting nukes, wouldn't it be pertinent for them to know that China is actively helping Iran obtain them?

"More than 250,000 classified State Department reports made public on Sunday reveal that China was urged to stop shipments through Beijing of missiles from North Korea to Iran, and that Saudi Arabia's monarch urged the United States to attack Iran's nuclear facilities."

There are two Americas people: Apple Pie America and Bearded-Spock America. Like twins on a soap opera one is nice and the other is evil and they don't know about each other. Because of the National Security Act of 1947, Bearded-Spock America has been given carte blanche to do whatever the heck it wants to. Us mundanes seeing their actions is one of their worst nightmares. They don't like being embarrassed and like the cowards they are, they hide behind real people doing actual work, ie. the American GI or foreign service agent.  Imagine trying to explain to the Founders why we are in Korea, how the Vietnam War came to be, the NSA, etc.  The whole foreign policy is crazy, and Bearded-Spock America has Apple Pie America convinced that it is necessary to protect them from terrorists, without of course, telling Apple Pie America that they have been setting up blood-thirsty puppet dictators through the Middle East for the last 50 years. As someone known to delve into declassified government docs, I'm grateful that now I won't have to wait until I'm in the nursing home to see them. They keep these things classified so long that everyone who could intelligently comment would too dead to do so.

I, for one, am enjoying seeing the elites exposed for a change.

The Ground Zero Mosque, Imam Rauf, & What Everyone is Missing

Let me say up front that I believe that Islam is a religion which has the spirit of Anti-Christ in it. Ask any Christian in Indonesia, Nigeria, or Eritrea what they think about the religion of peace, and they will tell you how terrifying living next to Muslims can be.

With that said, I want to put out my theory that Imam Rauf is not a true-blue radical Muslim regardless of what tapes have come out. The fact that he is on the Council of Foreign Relations Religious Council tells me all I need to know. I'm still working on my mammoth CFR post, which is the summation of my research into this elite group. Not just anyone can be in CFR, you must first be invited, and they carefully select their members. Here is a full listing from their own website of who sits on their Religious Advisory Board-mark these people and watch what they do:

Salam Al-Marayati, Muslim Public Affairs Council, Los Angeles, CA

Madeleine K. Albright, The Albright Group LLC, Washington, DC

R. Scott Appleby, Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, Notre Dame, IN

Reza Aslan, University of California Riverside, Los Angeles, CA

Peter L. Berger, Boston University, Brookline, MA

Charles E. Blake Sr., The Church of God in Christ, Inc., Los Angeles, CA

Chloe A. Breyer, The Interfaith Center of New York, New York, NY

Jean B. Elshtain, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

C. Welton Gaddy, The Interfaith Alliance, Washington, DC

Marc Gopin, George Mason University, Arlington, VA

Kenneth F. Hackett, Catholic Relief Services, Baltimore, MD

J. Bryan Hehir, Harvard University, Wellesley, MA

Serene Jones, Union Theological Seminary, New York, NY

Michael A. Kinnamon, National Council of Churches of Christ of the USA, New York, NY

Antonios Kireopoulos, The National Council of Churches, New York, NY

Leonid Kishkovsky, World Conference of Religions for Peace, Sea Cliff, NY

Richard D. Land, Southern Baptist Convention, Nashville, TN

Luis E. Lugo, The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, Washington, DC

Paul Marshall, Hudson Institute, Washington, DC

Ruth Messinger, American Jewish World Service, New York, NY

Joel Meyers, Rabbinical Assembly, New York, NY

Mark A. Noll, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN

Eboo Patel, Interfaith Youth Core, Chicago, IL

Feisal Abdul Rauf, Cordoba Initiative, New York, NY

Olin C. Robison, Oxford University, Shelburne, VT

David Saperstein, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, Washington, DC

Arthur Schneier, Appeal of Conscience Foundation, New York, NY

Chris Seiple, Institute for Global Engagement, Arlington, VA

Donald W. Shriver Jr., Union Theological Seminary, New York, NY

Richard Stearns, World Vision, Federal Way, WA

Peter Steinfels, Fordham Center on Religion and Culture, New York, NY

Robert A. F. Thurman, Columbia University, New York, NY

William F. Vendley, World Conference of Religions for Peace, New York, NY

Jim Wallis, Sojourners, Washington, DC

Peter D. Weaver, United Methodist Church, Lawrence, MA

Gloria E. White-Hammond, My Sister's Keeper, Jamaica Plain, MA

Robert S. Wood, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Salt Lake City, UT

You will notice that all of the Christian groups are those of the most liberal persuasion, with the exception of Richard Land from the Southern Baptist Convention. However, he is being used to push the need for the integration of illegals. Each character in the cast of CFR has a role to play. When you understand that, it becomes more obvious to see through their ruses.

The Cordoba Institute has raised money in partnership with the American Society for Muslim Advancement. So who financially supports something like the ASMA? Is it goat herders is some remote Moslem country scraping together their shekels? Hardly, take a gander at the list, you will find the usual suspects:

• Carnegie Corporation of New York
• Rockefeller Brothers
• Rockefeller Philanthropy
• Rockefeller Brothers Fund
• Global Fund for Women
• William & Mary Greve Foundation
• The Sister Fund
• The Russell Family Foundation
• Danny Kaye & Sylvia Fine Foundation
• Graham Charitable Foundation
• Deak Family Foundation
• Henry Luce Foundation
• The Elizabeth Foundation
• The Ms. Foundation
• Hunt Alternatives

Why don't we just ask David Rockefeller why he wants a Ground Zero Mosque so bad? Why don't we write these foundations and ask why they're supporting an organization that is hell-bent on pissing off America. I think this is a big component that no one is talking about.

Here's a chart I found at SGP:

 Regular readers of my blog will remember the story I did on how the robber barons are still robbing America through their tax-free social engineering programs. I believe we have just discovered another deliberate attempt to sidetrack us from whatever else it is they're doing. They, by which I mean the CFR, Trilateral, and all those types, are using our already well-founded distrust and animosity toward Islam and its barbaric belief system to foment further hatred. They are always working to keep us distracted, after all, they've probably spent billions by now on mass psychology and propaganda.

I don't mind being mad when it's justified, but I think they're laying it on a bit thick. Opening the "Cordoba" mosque on the 10th anniversary of 9-11? It's a bit rich. As Mosab Yousef said in his interview, this direct insult totally goes against Arab custom. Think about it, if they truly wanted to spread Islam throughout the US, wouldn't they follow their tried and true method of kindly infiltrating and being your best next-door neighbor as they have done in Europe. That is, until they reach 7 - 10% of the population, at which point they inform you that all your base belong to them. I do realize that this is occurring, but not at the rates that Europe experienced.

We do know that the United Nations is relocating Muslims to Nashville, Tennessee. I hope you realize by now that the overlap between who runs the UN, CFR and Trilateral is huge.  Putting Muslims in the smack middle of "Jesusland" is going to create conflict, which is what they're hoping for. Hopefully, we will be able to overcome evil with good, that would foil the plans of these globalists S.P.E.C.T.R.E types.