Although the women of the United States are confined within the narrow circle of domestic life, and their situation is, in some respects, one of extreme dependence, I have nowhere seen woman occupying a loftier position; and if I were asked... in which I have spoken of so many important things done by Americans, to what the singular prosperity and growing strength of that people ought mainly to be attributed, I should reply, To the superiority of their women.

--Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Wall Street and FDR: The Cliff Notes

For those of you who didn't have the time to be diligently reading my blog for the latest entry in our book-blogging series on how FDR was Wall Street's, well being a lady, I just can't say it! Anyway, I thought I would summarize the book with links on my posts in this series should any of these subjects pique your interest. I'm a firm believer in getting down to the source. That's why I so respect Dr. Sutton's work as he gets down to the wire and looks in the private papers (that have been made public, but not published), to get the inside baseball. Suffice it to say, this is not history the bankster owned History Channel is going to break down and spoon feed you.

So I'll just summarize and embellish the little nuggets we've found out about our man FDR, who every conservative by now realizes totally set up this country for Epic Fail with unfunded entitlements.  You knew that there was something weird about him, but you couldn't put your finger on it. Wonder no more as we expose him for the anti-American crook that he was. Harsh? I don't think so. Read on...

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Winning the Battle - Losing the War

Ben Swann reports from one  of the last of the independently owned TV stations. That's how he can get away with his reporting. Amazing stuff!

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

New X-file page up

and no, it is not perfect or complete, but that's just how it is with this stuff. It does have a lot more information than it used to, and I have attempted to arrange it in such a way that this stuff is put into a more easily digested context.

There are hours and hours of entertainment, or rather scare-u-tainment, depending on how you look at it.

I'll just share one of my highly rated comments over at the Daily Paul:

I can say the most exciting thing to me about the liberty movement was learning the mechanisms by which Satan is destroying freedom. We Christians in church talk about a generic decay of society, but reading libertarian websites like Lew and others gave me names, dates, and places. In other words, I got real answers to why the world is going to pieces and it lines up perfectly with the Word of God.
The Reece Committee, the CFR, the UN, the destruction of godly money, the destruction of the family via the Rockefeller foundation, etc. Knowing about all this makes me feel really empowered. If my fellow Christians could tap into this knowledge, we would see a huge shift in political power.

I hope my x-file page empowers you also.

Confessions of a Paulbot

 A great analysis of what the Liberty Movement is all about via a Daily Pauler.
We supporters of Ron Paul have been labeled with a number of unflattering terms over the years. But one of my favorites is the term "Paulbot".
The term conjures up images of clone armies; mindless hordes sweeping locust-like across the political landscape.
The irony is almost laughable.
We "Paulbots" are some of the most diverse and undisciplined bunch of people you will ever meet. Far from compromising our individuality to some hypothetical hivemind, we tend to be so opinionated and independent in our thinking that it is hard for us to agree on a time for tea.
Of any group of Americans today, we are probably the LEAST likely to fall into lockstep behind a populist demagogue or charismatic cult figure.
And yet that doesn't stop our detractors from trying to marginalize us through fear and ignorance. They intentionally confuse our conviction and enthusiasm with fanaticism. Sophisticated cynicism is an attitude that has been encouraged by the political establishment. Any group that truly threatens the status quo is automatically labeled a "cult". And this is a task made simpler because it has been so long since any large group of people have acted decisively, intelligently, AND independently without a hidden agenda.
But is it a cult when many people simultaneously decide to vacate a burning building?
And therein lies the ultimate irony.
We "Paulbots" are the ones who have seen the danger. We don't share a common religion or even an ideology. We disagree with one another about many things and often don't even agree with Ron Paul. But we DO share a love for our freedom, and we HAVE seen enough of the truth to know that it is in jeopardy.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man WILL behave oddly. And if you get enough one-eyed men together they will inevitably act with inexplicable passion and in unison to things that are invisible to the majority.
As a result it is easy for our opponents to label us as "wacky," our behavior as "bizarre," and our movement a "cult."
Easy, but very, VERY wrong.
Am I a "Paulbot"?
Sure, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
But that doesn't mean what you think it means.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Thank Them for Their Service


All the fallen on the other side know the score better than we down here do. If there is something fishy going on in our military, we need to as Samuel Adams said, "know the whole truth".

Here is a dramatic re-enactment of General Smedley Butler's War is a Racket circa 1930s.

Did you catch what he said about medals?

Looks like some soldiers have caught on - they signed up to fight for the protection of our homes and rights, not for the UN / NATO/ bankster global hegemony!!

Our soldiers have woken up to the fact that they aren't fighting to make us free. In a world where the United States has an armed brownshirts employed by Homeland Security, people need to wake up or the sacrifice our military have made is in vain.

Our military is supposed to protect us from enemies. That's what's so noble about it. But like everything Satan has been doing recently, he's flipped it to serve him. The veterans of the past are crying out for us to make things right. The TRUTH will set you free, not guns and bullets.

The love of money is the root of all evil.
Blessed are the peacemakers.

If you aren't getting the big picture by now, I'll pray for you.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Spiritual War Quotes

from The Christian in Complete Armour by William Gurnall. My favorite devotional full of great pictures of Biblical Truth. Spiritual preparedness is a must in these wicked times!

Paul was Nero's prisoner, but Nero was much more God's. (I:9)

No, the Christian must stand fixed to his principles, and not change his habit; but freely show what countryman he is by his holy constancy in the truth. (I:14)

Take heart therefore, O ye saints, and be strong; your cause is good, God himself espouseth your quarrel, who hath appointed you his own Son, General of the field, called 'the Captain of our salvation,' Heb 2:10. (I:16)

Blind zeal is soon put to a shameful retreat, while holy resolution, built on fast principles, lifts up its head like a rock in the midst of the waves. (I:17)

O take heed of this squint eye to our profit, pleasure, honour, or anything beneath Christ and heaven; for they will take away your heart ... that is, our love, and if our love be taken away, there will be little courage left for Christ. (I:18)

We must not confide in the armour of God, but in the God of this armour, because all our weapons are only 'mighty through God,' 2 Cor 10:4 (I:53)

Thus you see it is not armour as armour, but as armour of God, that makes the soul impregnable. (I:54)

I do not bid thee try the truth of thy grace by such a power as is peculiar to stronger grace, but by that power which will distinguish it from false [grace]. (I:57)

Whihle the Christian commits a sin he hates it; whereas the [hypocrite] loves it while he forbears it. (I:57)

If thou beest never so exact in thy morals, and not a worshipper of God, then thou art an atheist. (I:60)

In heaven we shall appear, not in armour, but in robes of glory. But here these are to be worn night and day; we must walk, work, and sleep in them, or else we are not true soldiers of Christ. (I:64)

The longer a soul hath neglected duty, the more ado there is to get it taken up.... (I:65)

Grace is of a stirring nature, and not such a dead thing, like an image, which you may lock up in a chest, and none shall know what God you worship. No, grace will show itself; it will walk with you into all places and companies; it will buy with you, and sell for you; it will have a hand in all your enterprises .... (I:69)

And doth not God deserve the best service thou canst do him in thy generation? (I:70)

Therefore it should be our care, if we would not yield to the sin, not towalk by, or sit at, the door of the occasion. (I:74)

Truth with self-denial [is] a better pennyworth, than error with all its flesh-pleasing. (I:82)

As you love your peace, Christian, be plain-hearted with God and man, and keep the king's highway. (I:83)

The proper seat of sin is the will, of comfort the conscience. (I:85)

It is true, Christian, the debt thou owest to God must be paid in good and lawful money, but, for thy comfort, here Christ is thy paymaster. (I:89)

Love refuseth nothing that love sends. (I:89)

A rent garment is catched by every nail, and the rent made wider. Renew therefore thy repentance speedily, whereby this breach may be made up, and worse prevented... (I:95)

Again, [Satan] will ask the Christian what was the time of his conversion. Art thou a Christian, will he say, and dost thou not know when thou commencedst? Now ... content thyself with this, that thou seest the streams of grace, ....; you may know the sun is up, though you did not observe when it rose. (I:96)

Behold therefore thy God at work, and promise thyself that what he is about, will be an excellent piece. (I:110)

Love cannot think any evil of God, nor endure to hear any speak evil of him, but it must take God's part.... (I:118)

Mercy should make us ashamed, wrath afraid to sin. (I:118)

Few are made better by prosperity, whom afflictions make worse. (I:118)

It is no policy to let thy lusts have arms, which are sure to rise and declare against thee when thine enemy comes. (I:124)

Take heed thou makest not the least child thine enemy by offering wrong to him; God will right the wicked even upon the saint. (I:126)

Thou hast no life to lose, because thou hast given it already to Christ, nor can man take away that without God's leave. (I:127)

Sin disabled man to keep God's law, but it doth not enfranchise or disoblige him that he need not keep it. (I:132)

His subject thou art whom thou crownest in thy heart, and not whom thou flatterest with thy lips. (I:134)

Christ will bear no equal, and Satan no superior; and therefore, hold in with both thou canst not. (I:134)

No, it is some noble enterprise I would have thee think upon, how thou mayst advance the name of Christ higher in thy heart, and [in the] world too, as much as in thee lies. (I:138)

Therefore tremble, O man, at any power thou hast, except thou usest it for God. Art [thou] strong in body; who hath thy strength? God, or thy lusts? (I:144)

When Satan finds the good man asleep, then he finds our good God awake; therefore thou art not consumed, because he changeth not. (I:146)

Bid faith look through the key-hole of the promise, and tell thee what it sees there laid up for him that overcomes; bid it listen and tell thee whether it cannot hear the shout of those crowned saints, as of those that are dividing the spoil, and receiving the reward of all their services and sufferings here on earth. (I:150)

Christ counts it his honour, that he is a king of a willing people, and not of slaves. (I:155)

All his commands are acts of grace, it is a favour to be employed about them. (I:155)

How can God stoop lower than to come and dwell with a poor humble soul? which is more than if he had said, such a one should dwell with him; for a beggar to live at court is not so much as the king to dwell with him in his cottage. (I:161)

O if once our hearts were but filled with zeal for God, and compassion to our people's souls, we would up and be doing, though we could but lay a brick a day, and God would be with us. (I:167)

And when God comes to reckon with his workmen, the ploughman and the sower shall have his penny, as well as the harvest-man and the reaper. (I:167)

Friday, May 25, 2012

Brett Kimberlin - My Unique Impression

Admittedly, I've only skimmed some other conservative blogs to see what this is all about. As a mother of five, that's all I have time for. But what popped out at me was where veteran reporter Stacy McCain listed where this tool was getting money for his bogus non-profit foundation.


Via Stacy McCain
Farview Foundation ………………………….…… $9,000
Tides Foundation …………………………………. $60,000
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift …..…. $45,000
HKH Foundation ……………………………..……. $20,000
Heinz Family Foundation ………….……..…. $20,000
Olive Branch Foundation …………….……… $15,000
Farview Foundation …………………………… $10,000
Barbra Streisand Foundation …………………$5,000
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift …..…. $19,000
Threshold Foundation ………………..…..… $20,000
Tides Foundation ………………………….….. $10,000
Nathan Cummings Foundation ………..… $10,000
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift …..…. $20,000
Fred Gellert Family Foundation ……………. $5,000
Silicon Valley Community Foundation ..… $5,000
Barbra Streisand Foundation ……………….. $5,000
Schwab Charitable Fund ………………………. $10,000
Silicon Valley Community Foundation .… $10,000
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift …..…. $6,000
TOTAL (2005-2009) .……………………………$304,000

On my humble little blog, I focus like a laser beam on the foundations because they are the vehicle by which socialism and liberalism travel. Conservatives like to get in a huff over stupid liberal, but never seem to wonder where the money comes from.

  1. Universities were transformed from bastions where Reason guided discussion, and was rooted in the Foundations of Christianity. Just about every institution of higher learning in the United States in the 19th century had chapel and a culture of God-fearing people. They didn't become the secular swamp of inane liberal drivel they are today by the free market. They were deliberately taken out with Foundation grant money.
  2. Please read the work I've done highligting the Reece Committee where it was proven that groups like the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation used their grant making power to diminish and re-educatte the population of the United States. To quote Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation: "
We operate here under directives which emanate from the White House....The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union."

3. It's also an established fact that monied Wall Streeters have a history of funding both sides of everything. For example, in my Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution series, we find Guaranty Trust (a JP Morgan Co.) funding anti-commie groups whilst laundering Ruskie Red money and sending them gold.  And today, we find our government spending billions on Muslim scare propaganda whilst at the same time giving the repressive and perverted Saudi Arabian regime (the land from which the majority of hijackers hailed) all the money and fancy killing toys they want. So this Brett dude is just a microcosm of a MO that has been decades in the execution. I've got his number: 1-800-BANKSTER-BOY, just like Obama and the rest of the Goldman gang.

If any enterprising blogger out there wants to run this one home, I'd suggest taking a look at each and every one of the foundations (the charitable gifts just mean the person gave by proxy through Fidelity and Schwab). We all know the Tides Foundation has ties to Soros and the the uber liberals. These others are small players, but definitely are worthy of examination.

So to summarize, my take is CONINELPRO. Look it up. Paid provocateur to shut us up and make us paranoid. Perfect love casts out fear.

Barack Obama - Damaged Goods

Jerome Corsi tells us what is going on in Hawaii and then some. In this interview, he's not only covering the birth certificate farce, but also he has the goods on Eric Holder covering for massive, multi-million (probably billion) dollar laundering of HSBC bank involving drug cartels.

Ya'll, there's a reason why they're arming remote control killer robots. As this information gets out, they realize how exposed they are. When the dollar collapses, if We the People don't go ape-nuts, then they will send in agent provocateurs to throw Molotovs and claim that we're doing it.

The global Elite now consider Obama "damaged goods". According to Corsi the fix is in for Romney, who will continue the globalist agenda.

For the life of me, I never understood why there would be anything controversial about producing your birth certificate. But look how many "conservatives" scoffed at people questioning where in the world it was. A piece of paper that ordinary people are required to have to enroll in school, get a driver license, etc. doesn't apply to this one man. They cite the newspaper clipping, but as the child of a newspaperman, I can tell you anyone can send that in and say whatever they want. Anyway, you'll also learn about the CIA roots of Obama's family. Obama is carrying forward the foundation-bankster coup of our country.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

The Apple can Fall Far, Far From the Tree

Check out this story written from Wikipedia Paul Harvey style:

In the story below I have removed the gentleman's last name to help dissolve any type of preconceived notion you may or may not have. Read and Enjoy. Let me know if it reminds you of anyone in particular... ;)
'Unshakably ethical, Howard refused offers of junkets and even turned down a part of his pay. During his first term, when congressional salary was raised from $10,000 to $12,500, Howard left the extra money in the Capitol disbursement office, insisting that he had been elected at the lower salary.'
His wife said he considered only one issue when deciding whether or not to vote for a bill:'Will this add to, or subtract from, human liberty?'
Howard is remembered for his highly libertarian Old Right stance, having maintained a friendship with Murray Rothbard for a number of years.
Howard was a vocal critic of the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan. Of the Truman Doctrine, he said: "Our Christian ideals cannot be exported to other lands by dollars and guns."[8] Howard was also "one of the major voices in Congress opposed to the Korean adventure," and "was convinced that the United States was largely responsible for the eruption of conflict in Korea; for the rest of his life he tried unsuccessfully to get the Senate Armed Services Committee to declassify the testimony of CIA head Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, which Howard told [Rothbard] established American responsibility for the Korean outbreak."[9]
Speaking on the floor of Congress, he said of military interventionism that,
Even if it were desirable, America is not strong enough to police the world by military force. If that attempt is made, the blessings of liberty will be replaced by coercion and tyranny at home. Our Christian ideals cannot be exported to other lands by dollars and guns. Persuasion and example are the methods taught by the Carpenter of Nazareth, and if we believe in Christianity we should try to advance our ideals by his methods. We cannot practice might and force abroad and retain freedom at home. We cannot talk world cooperation and practice power politics.”
In the summer of 1962, he wrote "an impassioned plea... for the abolition of the draft" in the National Review.Howard wrote:
“ When the American government conscripts a boy to go 10,000 miles to the jungles of Asia without a declaration of war by Congress (as required by the Constitution) what freedom is safe at home? Surely, profits of U.S. Steel or your private property are not more sacred than a young man's right to life.”
In addition to non-interventionism overseas, Howard strongly supported the gold standard because he believed it would limit the ability of government to inflate the money supply and spend beyond its means.[11] His son is not an advocate of the gold standard.
If you haven't already figured it out. The man named Howard, is non other that Howard Buffet, the father of Billionaire investor Warren Buffet. Stumbled upon this today and found it of interest and thought many of you would as well. oh how far the Apple falls from the tree sometimes.
Cheers and Happy Hump Day!
For Peace, Prosperity and Liberty

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

John Boehner's got a lot of Friends

For your consideration, the Friends of John Boehner. In case you haven't heard, Speaker Boehner went along with democrat Chuck Schumer's Ex - Patriot Act meant to stick it to those who renounce citizenship, an ex post facto law extraordinaire. Makes me think that someone who's name started with a Z might have gone off the reservation. The Left Coast Liberal has the outrage, I'll just give you some clues, let your eyes wander down the list and count up the banksters, Big pharm, etc. you'll find. These are the people who pay for such laws that retain power for them and shut you out. Some might have just thrown in money for Boehner, thinking that they were supporting a Republican to reduce the government. Hopefully, they're wiser now.

Chart via National Names Database.

Friends of John Boehner

Arthur Agatston
1947The South Beach Diet
Anthony J. Alexander
c. 1951CEO of FirstEnergy
Steve Ballmer
24-Mar-1956CEO of Microsoft
John F. Barrett
c. 1949CEO of Western & Southern Financial
Michael J. Bates
John Boehner
17-Nov-1949Speaker of the US House
Rich Bond
1950RNC Chairman, 1992-93
Rudy Boschwitz
7-Nov-1930US Senator from Minnesota, 1978-91
David Brennan
c. 1953CEO of AstraZeneca
William K. Brewster
8-Nov-1941Congressman from Oklahoma, 1991-97
William Brisben
?Brisben Companies
Glenn A. Britt
c. 1949CEO of Time Warner Cable
James G. Brocksmith, Jr.
c. 1941COO of KPMG, 1990-96
Charles E. Bunch
c. 1949CEO of PPG Industries
Rick L. Burdick
10-Jul-1951Partner, Akin Gump
Louis C. Camilleri
1955CEO of Altria
Red Cavaney
c. 1942CEO, American Petroleum Institute
Christopher M. Connor
c. 1956CEO of Sherwin-Williams
David A. Daberko
c. 1945CEO of National City, 1995-2007
Hal Daub
23-Apr-1941Mayor of Omaha, 1995-2001
Joseph J. DioGuardi
20-Sep-1940Congressman from New York, 1985-89
Bob Dole
22-Jul-1923US Senator from Kansas, 1969-96
Elizabeth Dole
29-Jul-1936US Senator from North Carolina, 2003-09
Craig S. Donohue
c. 1961CEO of Chicago Mercantile Exchange
James E. Evans
c. 1945General Counsel, American Financial Group
Richard T. Farmer
1934CEO of Cintas, 1968-95
Scott D. Farmer
c. 1959CEO of Cintas
John Feehery
c. 1963Washington lobbyist, pundit
Michael D. Fraizer
c. 1958CEO of Genworth Financial
Bradford M. Freeman
1942Freeman Spogli & Co.
William H. Goodwin, Jr.
21-Oct-1940President of CCA Industries
Joseph T. Gorman
1-Oct-1937CEO of TRW, 1988-2001
Mark B. Grier
c. 1953Vice Chairman of Prudential
Lanny Griffith
13-Aug-1951Lobbyist, Barbour Griffith & Rogers
Todd Harris
c. 1971Republican strategist
Charles A. Heimbold, Jr.
27-May-1933CEO of Bristol Myers Squibb, 1994-2001
Peter S. Hellman
c. 1949President of Nordson Corporation
Thomas E. Hoaglin
c. 1950CEO of Huntington Bancshares
David Hobson
17-Oct-1936Congressman, Ohio 7th
Lou Holtz
6-Jan-1937Head Coach, South Carolina, 1999-2004
Ray L. Hunt
6-Apr-1943Chairman of Hunt Oil
Paul Tudor Jones
Jerry Jurgensen
1952CEO of Nationwide, 2000-09
Kevin T. Kabat
c. 1956CEO of Fifth Third Bancorp
James Cox Kennedy
1947CEO of Cox Enterprises
John W. Kessler
c. 1936John W. Kessler Company
Robert J. Kohlhepp
c. 1941CEO of Cintas, 1995-2003
Richard Kovacevich
30-Oct-1943CEO of Wells Fargo, 1998-2007
Carl H. Lindner
22-Apr-191917-Oct-2011Cincinnati billionaire
S. Craig Lindner
c. 1955Co-CEO of American Financial Group
Marc S. Lipschultz
c. 1971Kohlberg Kravis Roberts
Bob Livingston
30-Apr-1943Congressman from Louisiana, 1977-99
Mark Loughridge
1953CFO of IBM
Thomas W. Luce III
c. 1940Former Partner, Hughes & Luce
Robert W. Mahoney
c. 1936CEO of Diebold, 1985-99
Bernie Marcus
12-May-1929Co-Founder of Home Depot
Andrew J. McKenna
17-Sep-1929Owner of Schwarz Paper
A. Malachi Mixon III
c. 1940CEO of Invacare
Michael G. Morris
c. 1947CEO of American Electric Power
Nathan Myhrvold
3-Aug-1959CTO of Microsoft, 1996-2000
Don Nickles
6-Dec-1948US Senator from Oklahoma, 1981-2005
Ted Olson
11-Sep-1940US Solicitor General, 2001-04
Gregory R. Page
1952President and COO of Cargill
Henry M. Paulson
28-Mar-1946US Secretary of the Treasury, 2006-09
Raymond Plank
29-May-1922Founder of Apache Corporation
Charles A. Ratner
c. 1942CEO of Forest City Enterprises
Mercer Reynolds
17-Jun-1945Chief fundraiser behind GWB presidential campaigns
James A. Rhodes
13-Sep-19094-Mar-2001Twice Governor of Ohio
Joseph B. Richey II
c. 1937Senior VP at Invacare
Ed Rogers
22-Nov-1958Republican strategist
James E. Rohr
18-Oct-1948CEO of PNC Financial
David Safavian
c. 1967Former OMB administrator
George A. Schaefer, Jr.
17-May-1945CEO of Fifth Third Bancorp, 1991-2007
John J. Schiff, Jr.
c. 1943CEO of Cincinnati Financial
Charles Schwab
29-Jul-1937Founded Charles Schwab & Co.
Robert F. Sharpe, Jr.
c. 1952EVP at ConAgra
Christopher Shays
18-Oct-1945Congressman from Connecticut, 1987-2009
Paul E. Singer
1944Billionaire, vulture capitalist
Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.
c. 1954CEO of NiSource
Shawn H. Smeallie
c. 1959Lobbyist, American Continental Group
Robert L. Smialek
c. 1943Applied Innovation
Richard K. Smucker
c. 1948President and Co-CEO of Smucker
John R. Strangfeld
c. 1955CEO of Prudential
Don Sundquist
15-Mar-1936Governor of Tennessee, 1995-2003
Jerry Sue Thornton
c. 1947President, Cuyahoga Community College
James S. Tisch
2-Jan-1953CEO of Loews
Anthony J. Vinciquerra
c. 1955CEO of Fox Networks Group
James L. Wainscott
c. 1956CEO of AK Steel Holding
Donald E. Washkewicz
c. 1950CEO of Parker Hannifin
Abigail S. Wexner
c. 1962Wife of Leslie H. Wexner
Leslie H. Wexner
8-Sep-1937CEO of Limited Brands
John C. Whitehead
2-Apr-1922US Deputy Secretary of State, 1985-89
Pamela Willeford
Mar-1950US Ambassador to Switzerland 2003-06
William Zeliff
12-Jun-1936Congressman from New Hampshire, 1991-97
Matthew Zell
c. 1967Equity Group Investments

I found bonus material:

Via New York Times

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Romney's Globalists

At the Charleston Voice, a list of Romney advisers and their links to leftist and globalist causes paints a clear picture of what to expect from a Romney administration --- more of the same statist bullhockey. Let me color up this list a bit.

General Michael Hayden — former director of the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency. He was director of NSA during its warrantless surveillance efforts to spy on American citizens. [CFR]*
Michael Chertoff — former head of the Homeland Security Department who now runs a security consulting agency that employs Michael Hayden.
Cofer Black — former director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center during George W. Bush’s first term. He now chairs an intelligence gathering agency Total Intelligence Solutions, a subsidiary of Blackwater Worldwide.
Paula Dobriansky — former Under Secretary in the State Department, and graduate of Harvard University where she serves as a Senior Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government. [CFR]*
Robert Joseph — former Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security and now a senior scholar at the National Institute for Public Policy.
Christopher Burnham — former Under Secretary-General of the United Nations under Kofi Annan and then Under Secretary of State under Condoleezza Rice. He holds degrees from Harvard University and Georgetown University. [CFR]*
Eliot Cohen — holds two degrees from Harvard and served as Counselor to the State Department under Condoleezza Rice. [CFR]*

Typical average conservative attitude when confronted with hypocrisy and inconsistencies.

Kim Holmes — holds two degrees from Georgetown University and served as Assistant Secretary of State under Colin Powell, responsible for directing the activities of 400 diplomats working closely with the United Nations. [CFR]*
Mitchell Reiss — served as Director of Policy Planning at the State Department under Colin Powell. He received degrees from Williams College, Tufts University, Columbia University, and Oxford University. He worked at the National Security Council under the direction of Brent Scowcroft and Colin Powell. He served on the National Security Council, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Ford Foundation. [CFR]*
Eric Edelman — has degrees from Cornell University and Yale University. Former Under Secretary of Defense under George W. Bush.
Dov Zakheim — foreign policy advisor to George W. Bush under Condoleezza Rice and consultant to the Secretary of Defense. Received degrees from Columbia University and Oxford University. [CFR]*
Richard Williamson — received degrees from Princeton University and the University of Virginia, and served as ambaeliossador to the United Nations under George W. Bush. [CFR]*
Kerry Healey — a graduate of Harvard, and Romney’s Lieutenant Governor for four years. She is married to Sean Healey, a multimillionaire. [CFR]*
John Lehman — served as Secretary of the Navy under President Ronald Reagan and was a member of the 9/11 Commission. Known for his quote: “Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat.” [CFR]*
Dan Senor — holds a master’s degree from Harvard, and is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He accompanied George W. Bush to Jerusalem to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the State of Israel.
Robert Kagan — holds a PhD from Yale University where he was inducted into the secretive Skull and Bones group. He worked at the State Department as a speechwriter for George Shultz and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (see footnote below). He was named by the CFR’s Foreign Policy journal as one of the world’s “Top 100 Public Intellectuals.” [CFR]*
Walid Phares — born in Beirut, he has testified before committees of the State, Justice, Defense, and Homeland Security Departments, the European Parliament, and the United Nations Security Council.
Norm Coleman — Minnesota Senator from 2003 to 2009, he lost his seat to Al Franken in a contested election. He was a member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), but switched to the Republican Party in 1996. He is a strong supporter of the war in Iraq and the War on Terror. 
Jim Talent — may be the only Romney advisor with any kind of conservative credentials, serving as a distinguished fellow at the Heritage Foundation
Nile Gardiner — a British conservative commentator who works at the Heritage Foundation. He was a former aide to British PM Margaret Thatcher. He is a graduate of  Yale University, and was an adviser to Rudy Giuliani’s 2008 presidential campaign.

Read more:

Got enough CFR members there to convince me that the total sell-out of America will continue unabated. Oh, and your Congress people have already been thoroughly bought out. Just look at the Tea Party freshmen who have already accepted big bankster money.

Ok, so I did a map of most of the people on this list, but some were left out. As always, check out the link to explore for yourself.

 There are a lot of characters here. Most of your big, international globalists NGOS are represented, including Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which was found by the Reece Committee of 1953 to have three goals: Takeover of the State Dept, takeover of public education, takeover of the teaching of American History at the collegiate level. Also this group concluded way back in 1908 that nothing was as effective as war to change a society. Google trauma-based mind control. Check out the bologna "expert" groups in the lower right corner. Need an "expert" to tell you what you need to push for that next multi-billion dollar defense contract - look no further than the group that you're little cartel has created for that express purpose.

Also notice the Heritage and AEI. I've previously covered in my Dick Scaife post how these groups were and are funded by big money interests, not the all-American little guy routine they try to pass off.

Anyway, if you think that this cast of characters is going to give you anything other than what we've experienced under Obama, you are delusional. We are at the tail-end of a decades-long, inter-generational long con. They aren't just going to let it go. So go ahead and give in --- drink the Romney Kool-Aid, hoist your UN/NATO flag, and await your instructions. As for me, I'll do anything but that.

Monday, May 21, 2012

The GOP Game Plan

via Graphic Artists for Ron Paul

Like I've said before this is the greatest political experiment since Goldwater. How will the Establishment organism react to having a real true-blue American in their petri dish? It's like an antibiotic, they recoil from it, and in the case of Oklahoma, turn off the lights.

I bet it really burns Romney's grits that the r3volution just sweeped Minnessota, got a decent fraction of his home state of Michigan all while taking half of his home base of Massachusetts. 

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Heteros to Homos: We Weren't Using it Anyway

Cindy at Get Along Home has written up a great post about why the whole Homo Matrimony Discussion/Distraction is just the end product of a very long slide:

As long as we’ve still got easy, no-fault divorce, and a culture that excuses and applauds all sorts of “straight” perversion, I’m afraid I just can’t get myself all worked up about a mere one or two percent of the population wishing to do what the rest of us have been doing for a couple of generations now—have a temporarily monogamous life with the person of their choosing, along with all the privileges that the State has chosen to attach to that temporarily monogamous lifestyle.
Let’s face it, Christians, we’re not having this conversation because homosexuals pose some kind of threat to our way of life. (They don’t.) We’re having this conversation because we’re finally at the bottom of a slippery slope that we polished to a glossy finish for ourselves when we separated marriage, sex, and procreation from each other, making the union of matrimony about our own happiness rather than about familial and social stability. Now we’re just trying to stop the slide before we fall off the cliff entirely. But we’re not much interested in doing the hard work of climbing back up to marital sanctity ourselves!
Modern marriage is about being allowed to live in a long-term sexual relationship with whomever you please, for as long as you wish, as long as you both love each other.
Please read the rest 

If Christians had ignored the Episcopal church (and others, but they were the first) saying contraception was a-ok back in 1930, and not hopped on the planned parenthood bandwagon, we'd be living in a different world today - way different. The National and World Councils of Churches had a large part in pushing contraception onto mainline churches in the progressive era. The Catholic Church stood strong against this, giving them a reputation. Even now, us large family fans of the Reformation get asked "are you Catholic?" The Rockefellers, who put population reduction on the top of their agenda, finally brought Notre Dame president Theodore Hesburgh on board with them. From that point onward, and I suspect multiple inroads were being made to take down the orthodoxy of the Roman Catholic Church at that time, you can see a free-fall in devoutness among Catholics. Just look at those in Congress claiming the name. This philosophy of the world percolated into all your congregational type churches via media and basic worldliness. It's very hard to top-down control autonomous churches, but using the monkey-see, monkey-do qualities of mass media, you'll get them repeating what a pain kids are, how expensive they are, how we don't need as many in a modern society, etc.

Like Ken Ham says, the Answers are in Genesis. They use evolution as their scientific basis for determining the future of the human race. Notice that "they" are doing the directing.

If you don't get anything else from this post - understand this: monied interests have been working overtime for decades to eliminate your family from the human race. That sounds crazy because it is crazy, but if you ever are bold enough to launch yourself into a full-fledged study of eugenics, you'll find them in their own words admitting it. Our own State Department issued a document, NSSM 200, calling for world-wide depopulation (located in Section II). 

I would argue that just like in 1984, the Elites are trying to divert sexuality somewhere where it doesn't procreate. If they can get you to sterilize yourself voluntarily, well that's just swell. No need to set up a Dr. Mengele tube-tying medical prison er, women's empowerment camp. In the third world, where children are your security, they don't go down so easily. Thus the HcG in the ol' vaccine trick. Pregnant? Than you need a tetanus shot. What the women didn't realize is that the tetanus shot was tainted with the HcG hormone that will cause her to miscarry and then increase her chances of being sterile by hardening up her ovaries.  ARGGH. Anger level -- rising! Vengeance is mine saith the Lord. Oh man, are these people going to get it!

This stuff is pure demonism, and maybe I'll get around to a post connecting these people to their Dark Lord. Just look up Lucis Trust and Theosophy and things will start to add up or just blow your mind. One of the two will happen, I guarantee!

So to recap, the family, the building block of civilization is under attack and has been for decades. I'm sure you knew that. But if you want to protect yourself from these people you need to understand how they operate - so you don't unwittingly go along with their agenda. "The serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field."

Check out this series by Dr. Dennis Cuddy, another North Carolinian giving you an overview of the master plan of which this homo stuff is just a mere piece.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Wall Street and FDR: The Swope Plan

In Appendix A of our saga, Wall Street and FDR, is a copy of the infamous Swope Plan that was the basis for the National Recovery Act. Recall that Gerald Swope was the president of General Electric and still inspires corporate socialists like Warren Buffet today.

The Swope plan is an extraordinary document. One short paragraph removes all industry from the anti-trust laws—a long-time industrial goal—while numerous lengthy paragraphs detail proposed social plans. In sum, the Swope Plan was a transparent device to lay the groundwork for the corporate state by defusing potential labor opposition with a massive welfare carrot.
The trade associations mentioned in paragraph one, allow cartels to be legally formed, which is what the big money trusts were agitated for with legislation like this. Using the police power of the state, they could crush any competitors who didn't belong to their communist trade associations.

I'll just pick out the best bits that resonate with what I know about current events.

1. All industrial and commercial companies (including subsidiaries) with 50 or more employees, and doing an interstate business, may form a trade association which shall be under the supervision of a federal body referred to later. (oui, oui, mon amie? Isn't this what they have in France, lots and lots of companies of 49 or less to get around the "government supervision?")

2. These trade associations may outline trade practices, business ethics, methods of standard accounting and cost practice, standard forms of balance sheet and earnings statement, etc., and may collect and distribute information on volume of business transacted, inventories of merchandise on hand, simplification and standardization of products, stabilization of prices, and all matters which may arise from time to time relating to the growth and development of industry and commerce in order to promote stabilization of employment and give the best service to the public. Much of this sort of exchange of information and data is already being carried on by trade associations now in existence. A great deal more valuable work of this character is possible. (Standardization does make things more efficient. Like a knife it can be used for good or evil. Hello ISO.- ooh, check out the poster contest!) Also keep in mind that these trade associations are under puppets of the banksters, as we saw with the American Construction Council)

Friday, May 18, 2012

Romney - Hearts and Minds

Here's the roundup of him working like heck to piss off as many people off as possible:

  • New York Times - Romney campaign ropes off reporters. Secret Service says it's not for security. When they try to get out of their little "area", a Romney worker puts her arms out and says we're not doing this, whatever that means. Read the whole article to get a sense of the crazy we'll be experiencing with this Goldman man. A sample:
Mr. Romney’s team has a traveling press secretary, Rick Gorka, but he is rarely willing or able to speak on the record. On Wednesday afternoon, in a conciliatory gesture, Mr. Romney did something unusual: he walked to the back of a campaign plane and spoke briefly with reporters.
He joked about what he had said beyond their earshot: “You should see all the things we are saying in private, though, really.” When asked if it was his decision to try to keep the press off the rope line, he replied that he was “just watching, just watching.”
  • Because the Romney campaign did not like what happened in Nevada, they're taking their toys and going home to their new and improved GOP. They're setting up a shadow Nevada Republican Party. Regular readers of this blog will see the irony in Romney setting up a shadow GOP to go along with his shadow government, controlled by the megabanks for the last 100 years. When manipulating and controlling the poor fools at the local level fails, just go around the process and make your own. With billions in funny money, you can afford it. From the Las Vegas Sun:
Fed up with an inept and self-destructive GOP apparatus in Nevada, the Republican National Committee and the Mitt Romney campaign have decided to erect a “shadow state party” in this critical swing state, sources confirmed today.
“They are still bogged down in the minutiae of whether Romney will be the presumptive nominee,” scoffed a GOP strategist familiar with the details of the restructuring. “We don’t have time for that when the Obama campaign already is in full campaign mode. We have no use for them (the state GOP).”
The lack of faith in the Republican Party here intensified with the botched February caucus, metastasized after the Ron Paul takeover in Sparks and reached its zenith with Tuesday evening’s call for RNC Chairman Reince Priebus to resign by a divided Clark County GOP.
Yeah they're not all viva la r3volution. hee, hee.

  • The Bible says if you have aught with your brother, then go to him, and you've got to admit that's what Luke Rudowski does (anybody that goes up to David Rockefeller at his house and says we're going to defeat the New World Order has my respect.) - 
Anyhow, this little video proves that Mitt is totally in bed with the banksters but lies to you with a big smile.

  • Socialist Bernie Sanders says that Obama and Mitt are no different, as they're being funded by the same people. While I don't recommend his socialist solutions, he accurately pinpoints the heart of what is wrong in this country. Six financial institutions (megabanks) have assets equaling 2/3 of US GDP. Translation: this isn't a country, its a company and Congress, the military, etc. are just middle management.

Romney's support has proven so shallow and Paul's so deep that, all over the country, at GOP meetings in which delegates are selected to represent a county at the state convention or a state at the national convention, there are too many Paulites in the room to allow pro-Romney party officials to get their favored slates pushed through without underhanded shenanigans. This is having important effects. The most immediately important of these is that, in states where delegates are bound to vote for the candidate who won the state's primary vote (often Romney), the delegates who care enough to actually participate in the process are Paul supporters, and they are selecting Paul-favoring delegates. For example, whereas of the 28 delegates that Nevada will be sending to Tampa, eight are bound to Paul and 20 are bound to Romney, 14 of Romney's 20 are really Ron Paul supporters who'd only be voting for Romney because they are "bound" to. And in Colorado, where 14 delegates are bound to Romney, and only two to Paul, what the official numbers don't say is that the 16 uncommitted are probably all Paul supporters.
For a man that's been running for president for the past 4-6 years, spending millions of bucks, you'd think he'd have more of a nationwide network. Instead, he'd just relying on the mass psychology foundation that has been laid by generations previous. That is, you have to vote for a D or R. If the media says that those are your choices, then those are your choices idiots - got it???! This seems to be working with the older folks who use FoxNews and MSNBC to keep them company all day. Some of us, however,  ain't taking no more &^$ off these people and see them for what they are - criminals who'll buy up (fill-in-the-blank: Congress, Republican/Democratic state and local parties) to get their way. The fix was in for Romney here in Tennessee before the primary season got going, our governor supporting Romney, and the TN state convention is all in for Romney, even though Santorum "won" Tennessee.

In just about every single state delegate convention where there was actual citizen participation, Romney folks have been flabbergasted by resistance to voting for their  man. Now some of you might say that its those dirty Ron Paul supporters making scenes causing all this ruckus. What is actually is, is Romney folks not following Roberts Rules and when it's brought to their attention from the floor (yes by a Ron Paul supporter) they wig out and act crazy. You see it's the Paul supporter fault for insisting on the rules, which are supposed to create order. You know I could write a blog around the subject, "everything I learned about politics, I learned in church" where I have experience with Robert's Rules and cliques who'd just assume that everything would be automatically voted their way. When you don't, things get ugly. I'm definitely seeing that same dynamic at work here.
Related Posts with Thumbnails