Quote of the Day

Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematical plan of reducing a people to slavery.

--Thomas Jefferson, Notes on British America, 1774

Consider the last 60 years of presidential elections, from an old WND article:

In 1952 and 1958, Adlai Stevenson and Dwight Eisenhower were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1960, both John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon were members.
In 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson was not a member. Neither was his opponent, Barry Goldwater. But Johnson had already staffed his administration with plenty of insiders.
In 1968, it was Nixon versus club member Hubert H. Humphrey.
In 1972, it was Nixon again against Democratic Party CFR member George McGovern.
In 1976, it was CFR Republican Gerald Ford losing to CFR Democrat Jimmy Carter.
In 1980, Ronald Reagan was not a member, but his running mate, George H.W. Bush, was. So were both of his opponents – Carter and independent John Anderson. Assuming office, however, Reagan quickly named 313 CFR members to his team.
In 1984, another CFR member, Walter Mondale, was nominated by the Democratic Party to challenge Reagan.
In 1988, CFR member Bush took on CFR member Michael Dukakis.
In 1992, Bush was challenged by an obscure governor from Arkansas, Bill Clinton, who won the "trifecta" by being a member of the CFR, Trlateral Commission and Bilderberg Group. He was also a Rhodes scholar – another favored credential of the worldwide elite.
In 1996, Clinton was challenged by CFR member Bob Dole.
In 2000, CFR member Al Gore ran against non-member George W. Bush, but his running mate, Dick Cheney, was.
In 2004, Bush was challenged by CFR member John Kerry.
Not sure about 2008 candidates, but know that Obama's administration is chock full of CFR members.

I'm working on a map of CFR, it's going to take awhile as there are over 1000 nodes to deal with. I think it will be very enlightening. CFR members are more heavily concentrated in the State, Treasury and Defense departments and infest the federal reserve system. It's becoming more apparent to me that our country is actually controlled by a few hundred people, many of which are unelected, who have absolute disdain for the American way of life.

Go ahead, throw your vote away!

Demoralization of Everyday Life - Race

Up next in our excursion into subversion, is the manipulation of racial and ethnic politics for the purpose of the old divide and conquer routine. Here again, our host Yuri Bezmenov tells us how this technique was used and brutally implemented in communist Russia.

Racial and ethnic interrelations is one of the most vulnerable areas for demoralization. There is not a single Communist country where racial groups are 'equal' and enjoy as much freedom to develop themselves culturally and economically as in America. Actually, there are not too many “capitalist” countries where ethnic minorities have it as good as in the USA. I have been to many countries of the world and I can state to you, my dear Americans, that your society is the least discriminatory. The Communist 'solution' for racial problem is 'final': they simply murder those who are different AND stubbornly insist on remaining different. Stalin played with whole populations of 'ethnics'-- 'resettling' Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians in Siberia, relocating Crimean Tartars from the tropics to permafrost and Koreans from the Far East to the Kazakhstan deserts. But unfortunately, an 'average' American never recalls these commonly known facts when his attention is drawn to domestic 'racial discrimination' issues by those who profess 'racial harmony' along the socialist principle guidelines. Why? Simple: because American 'race discrimination fighters' NEVER MENTION these facts. If the USA were located on a separate planet from the Communists, I would probably agree with Martin Luther King when he said that “America is a racist country.’ But when these statements are made on THIS planet and in THE MOST INTEGRATED NATION IN THE WORLD, I say to your 'fighters for racial equality': you are hypocrites and instruments (even if unwilling) of DEMORALIZATION.

The American traditional solution of racial and ethnic problems is slow but efficient: the 'melting pot' which raises the less developed groups to a HIGHER level. It has worked for more than a century of American history and created the most harmonious and productive nation on Earth. The present day 'solution' to racial inequality is borrowed from Communist mythology: EQUALITY of all racial and ethnic groups LEGISLATED by the government and ENFORCED by state bureaucracies. We know perfectly well that neither races nor INDIVIDUALS are equal, in every respect. We know that every nation and race has its peculiar character, abilities, traditions, mentality, and ability to learn and its individual PACE OF DEVELOPMENT. By mimicking the Soviet 'national policy' of equality America simply erases the distinct racial characteristics that have made this country great.

The false cry of racism is a non-issue. Remember, we studied non-issues a while back. For every non-issue there is an equal and opposite issue. If racism is not the issue, what is? Division, and hopefully a little resentment and even anger will be ginned up. Liberals wait with their fingers crossed wishing that someone will be angry enough to do something crazy. That would make the perfect pretext for some more heavy-handed legislation.

 The race card is getting pretty worn and tattered, and those of us who don't play with it can easily identify when it's being held and played.  I think most Americans are getting pretty sick of it. Yuri makes a great point that America is exceptional among the countries of the world for our racial tolerance. The blacks of this country have been mistreated and continue to be mistreated.  I support reparations for blacks, not for slavery, but because they have been the targets of social engineering. Those responsible have deep enough pockets to provide those reparations. It is not any mistake that the black family has been destroyed. I know for a fact that the government welfare officials target black churches to promote the latest "program". This is done after a "disbandment ceremony" as not to affect the 501(c). I could start a whole 'nother blog that did nothing but detail how this group has been experimented upon, used and abused. Instead I'll link to the trailer of what must be an awesome documentary, called Maafsa 21; I saw this at Mommylife.



Check out the Maafsa 21 link on my roll under X-files, and click on podcast. There you will find a Living in Black Radio interview with the producer of this documentary. Guess what? The people who funded and orchestrated the progressive agenda in the early 20th century are also mentioned as accomplices in reducing the black population.

Currently, I think Yuri would comment that the New Black Panthers and the DoJ's blind eye regarding their doings fits perfectly into the plan of causing division. I think it's a testament to how tolerant America really is that they have to go to this level to try to keep the racial rhetoric in the media.

Rule 5 Sunday

Adrienne's Corner links up to the Daily Gator's exhaustive list of useless federal agencies to be gotten rid of without us even missing them.

Caught Him with a Corndog is rallying support for the ban on the drilling moratorium.

Maggie's Notebook is on the same page as myself, highlighting how police officers in Gulf Shores protecting BP back down when you ask for their supervisor.

At Bread Upon the Waters, an analysis of Philadelphia ACORN and the Department of "Justice".

At Get Along Home, we are discussing the "dirty little secrets" of homeschooling.

Spunky Homeschool exposes the dangers of a national curriculum. Even if you don't homeschool, this is an important issue that will affect you.

Congratulations to the McCain family on the nuptials of their 21-year-old daughter. Atta girl Kennedy! 

That wasington Rebel, the Irish Cicero, has a great post, "We're Fluxed?" All's I got to say is, Larry McDonald was right.

Weird Al was in town recently, but I didn't make it, so I'll compensate with this fun little ditty:

Repeal It All! - The Definitive List

I saw this great article entitled Progress to the Precipice via Vox Day. You should read the whole thing. Professor Miller traces the march of Progressivism through the years and explains how the Progressive agenda "refounded" our country on a set of principles other than those of the Constitution. If you have read or skimmed the Deliberate Dumbing Down of America (link to the left), you will recognize some of the names in this essay.

Our debt crisis, in sum, has everything to do with the transformation of morality and government effected by the late-19th- and early-20th-century Progressive movement. Far from being largely ineffectual reformers, the Progressive academics who articulated the new conception of Freedom and the “positive” State, outlined above, were also the initiators of the entitlement programs that lie at the core of our crisis today. How Americans ultimately decide to resolve this crisis — by reining in spending or meekly submitting to far higher taxes — will serve either to revitalize the Founders’ conception of freedom, and the idea of limited government that flows from it, or seriously accelerate America’s century-long slide into the “overlordship” of Progressivism.

We hear a lot of talk about how we'll repeal Obamacare, but I think we shouldn't stop there, but push to REPEAL IT ALL. What does REPEAL IT ALL entail? It's all about going back to the root of the problem, the Progressive Agenda and getting rid of it. Even if Obamacare gets repealed, we still have to address the unfunded liabilities of Medicare and Social Security, not to mention all of the areas that the federal government has wound its unholy tendrils.

Let's start at the beginning:

Why Are 7,000 Marines and 46 Warships Going to Costa Rica?

Costa Rica ranks high in the international rankings set forth by that preeminant global body, the UN.

According to Scott Oliver at We Love Costa Rica.com:

On the 2nd July 2010 the Costa Rica Congress authorized the entry of 46 U.S. warships capable of carrying 200 helicopters and warplanes, plus 7,000 U.S. Marines "who may circulate the country in uniform without any restrictions", plus submarine killer ships to the Costa Rican coast for "anti-narcotics operations and humanitarian missions' between 1st July 2010 until 31st December 2010.

 Thing is, Costa Rica doesn't  have a huge drug problem compared to other Latin American countries.  It seems like a pretty lame pretext to me. Any ideas as to what's up with this?

Video from the Gulf

I saw this via Infowars, Marguerite Cravatt is a Gulf native who captured a very interesting incident involving an ambulance and a Gulf Shores police officer. I heard Lindsey Williams, author of The Energy Non-Crisis, say that his sources tell him that this well is under at least 20,000 psi. A normal well is under an average of 1500 psi, to give you a reference. He also says that volatile gases are coming out along with the oil. Chemicals like Hydrogen Sulfide, Benzene, and other VOCs.

Demoralization of Everyday Life - Health

Continuing our journey through the subversion process, we come to how the everyday health of citizens can be a tool to take down a country. Again, here is Yuri Bezmenov, ex-KGB agent who specialized in propoganda enlightening us (written circa 1982):

Very similar methods are being used in the area of medical and health services and sports, (as part of an activity meant to keep the population healthy). By encouraging 'professionalism' in spectator sports rather than encouraging individual sports participation, America enfeebles herself as a nation. Most American adults who 'love sports' watch TV sports programs, while munching pretzels with their beer, and NOT taking physical participation in sports activity. Unlike in the USSR, sports is not a COMPULSORY part of elementary education in America. Impressive victories of Soviet athletes at international competitions further facilitate the IDEAS OF THE SUPREMACY of SOCIALISM in the area of public health, thus convincing more and more Americans of the need to emulate the Soviet system and introduce it into the American schools.

How true is that! I really can 't add more to that, except to say that back in the 1950s, PE class was an everyday thing in high school, not the one semester of required health that is now commonplace. Isn't it ironic that the social planners who are probably responsible for the dramatic cutbacks in PE (cuts into indoctrination time), are now saying kids need to get more active.

What many Americans do not realize, is that what they see on their TV screens is not REAL Soviet sport. The majority of the USSR population is not 'athletic' at all; they are sick from the lack of correct nutrition and alcoholism. Soviet athletes are state-created exceptions to the general national deterioration in the USSR.
A similar myth is being promoted in the U.S. about 'free health care' in the USSR. While working in Moscow, accompanying numerous foreign delegations and showing them 'regular' medical facilities in clinics and kolkhos hospitals, my guests did not all realize that I was taking them to specially prepared 'exclusive' medical establishments, 'only for the eyes of foreigners.’ When I arranged interviews with Soviet doctors, telling my guests about the 'glorious achievements' of Soviet surgery, some of them had no way of checking if these 'achievements' were available to USSR collective farmers or workers in Siberia. They are not. And many Americans know about this, although they have never visited my old country. Yet the tendency of U.S. bureaucrats is to enlarge the state-run medicare, despite the fact that, as shown in the USSR and elsewhere, socialized medicine is sub-standard, less efficient, and most definitely less progressive than privately owned and operated medical facilities within a properly functioning free market system.

In high school, I read Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Cancer Ward. That book will explain to you why health care is an oxymoron in a socialistic system.  It's more like controlled "death care".

Demoralization in the area of food CONSUMPTION patterns is also effective in the introduction of such things as 'junk foods.’ No, KGB agents do not put chemicals into American food and drink. It is done by some American mega-monopolies who operate along the same principles as Soviet 'Obshchepit' (Public Food Service): they look at consumers as 'units of consumers,’ not individuals. Abolishing freely competing SMALL food companies, who HAD TO TREAT YOU INDIVIDUALLY to survive economically, these giants of indigestion artificially CREATE consumers' tastes and demands which may not be in the interests of your health but surely in the interests of the monopoly profit. And here I tend to agree, at least in part, with America's Ralph Naders, and consumer protection groups, although I do not share their ideas on the solution of the problem.

The fact that over half (51%) of American food is being imported is a great cause for alarm. We have the land and resources to be able to feed ourselves. There is no reason for this unless you deliberately want America not be self-sustainable. The fact that a lot of the food that is produced in the US is owned by mega-corporations like Archer Daniels Midland, ConAgra, and Monsanto should also give one pause. When anything is centralized by human hands, you know that it will not end well. I'm not a health food nut, but the expanding size of my family has caused me to cut down on the junk food. We're all better off for it. Remember to eat to live, not live to eat. So is there a conspiracy to control us all with food? You will find those in both political camps who claim evidence to that fact.  I've mapped below a few of the biggest ag companies, probably left out some key ones, but pay attention to who is on the board at these companies:

double click to enlarge. I put the obligatory CFR on there because they have people on the board of everything. To explore this map further, click here.


So what is up with making America a more unhealthy nation? The goal is enfeebled masses who are too lazy, apathetic, and depressed to take action or resist the coming tyranny. The one thing I think Yuri would have added had he written this today would be the advent of psychotropic drugs handed out like candy. In the book of Revelation, it talks of there being sorcery in the end times. Everyone, until recently, just brushed that aside as figurative. But the greek word that sorcery is translated from is pharmakeia, where we get our word pharmacy. World Net Daily had an article awhile back explaining how 99% of those committing crazed mass shootings (Columbine, Virginia Tech, Andrea Yates, etc.) were on these psych drugs. Apparantly the biggest danger is when you just go on or off the medication. Couple that with the fact that millions of American children are subjected to controlled substances like Ritalin and Stratera. I have not researched the origins of medicating children outside of mental institutions, but I'm sure it would be revealing. I would not be surprised if certain universities and social planners came up in the process. Oh, and by the way, if a kid can play a video game for hours on end, they don't have ADD.

 All quotes from Yuri Bezmenov are taken from his pamphlet, "Love Letter to America" via Useless Dissident.