Although the women of the United States are confined within the narrow circle of domestic life, and their situation is, in some respects, one of extreme dependence, I have nowhere seen woman occupying a loftier position; and if I were asked... in which I have spoken of so many important things done by Americans, to what the singular prosperity and growing strength of that people ought mainly to be attributed, I should reply, To the superiority of their women.

--Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

Friday, September 16, 2011

And Now a Message from H.G. Wells

H.G. Wells, pioneering sci-fi author of The Time Machine, and War of the Worlds also was a member of the Fabian society, an avowed socialist, supporter of Stalin, lover to Margaret Sanger (eeww!), a eugenicist, and all-round one-worlder. If you don't agree with him about these things, you must be an Eloi. He even wrote a book called The New World Order:

This new and complete Revolution we contemplate can be defined in a very few words. It is
(a) outright world-socialism, scientifically planned and directed, plus
(b) a sustained insistence upon law, law based on a fuller, more jealously conceived restatement of the personal Rights of Man, plus
  (c) the completest freedom of speech, criticism, and publication, and a sedulous expansion of the educational organization to the ever growing demands of the new order....
Putting it at its compactest, it is the triangle of Socialism, Law, and Knowledge which frames the Revolution that may yet save the world."
H.G. Wells The New World Order 1939 
Hate to break it to him, but the scientific planners who are currently giving us global warming up our behinds and citicizing the mental states of those that disagree would seem to put points a and c at odds with each other currently. And buddy how they keep revising the law to suit their needs, what with Bretton-Woods in 1971 when they needed more cash and couldn't dilute gold anymore. Plus, due to the planned state seeing how the citizens of a republic don't need a liberal arts education, but only how to be factory workers, our law enforcement doesn't know or understand the law. Because the source of American morality has been removed from the memory of most, one can't tell if instructions from these planners are right or wrong. And never, ever try to defend yourself, that's totally wrong, Mr. Wells tells you so:
"Armament should be an illegality everywhere, and some sort of international force should patrol a treaty-bound world. Partial armament is one of those absurdities dear to moderate-minded 'reasonable' men. Armament itself is making war. Making a gun, pointing a gun, and firing it are all acts of the same order. It should be illegal to construct anywhere upon earth any mechanism for the specific purpose of killing men. When you see a gun it is reasonable to ask: 'Whom is that intended to kill?'"
H.G. Wells The New World Order 1939
Our founders intended for weapons to be at the ready to kill tyrants like you, for they knew that they would always be with us plotting dastardly designs.

1 comment:

  1. Swine like him are always full of stupid stuff like this. Long on the generalities and short on the partickalers.

    That roving armed international peace keeping force would be controlled how? Genius answer: it would be "some sort of" force. That's it. He had plenty of time to think this through but he didn't see any problem with proposing this. Like it could work?

    Imagine a roving "U.N. force" of Venezuelan, Ugandan, and Mexican troops. What could go wrong? Oh, right. It would be a first-world force. That would work. Hope those Venezuelans trust us.

    See? It's so simple. Just use the word "international" or "global" and you're good to go. And our world would be "treaty bound" just like the Soviet Union was bound by its constitution. Or us, for that matter.


Related Posts with Thumbnails