Although the women of the United States are confined within the narrow circle of domestic life, and their situation is, in some respects, one of extreme dependence, I have nowhere seen woman occupying a loftier position; and if I were asked... in which I have spoken of so many important things done by Americans, to what the singular prosperity and growing strength of that people ought mainly to be attributed, I should reply, To the superiority of their women.

--Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Meet Your Elites: Anne-Marie Slaughter

Ok, so I was surfing around and found this well-documented article by Tony Cartalucci about Anne-Marie Slaughter, a name I remembered reading in passing in my research. But I didn't know much about her, and upon investigating, I find her worthy to make "elite" status.

It should be noted that Slaughter has sat upon the boards of Fortune 500 corporations McDonald’s and Citigroup as well as a Council on Foreign Relations board member. She is the author of a book literally titled, “A New World Order” whose catch line is “Global governance is here.” In it she argues that such governance is done through “a complex global web of government networks.” Upon examination it is obvious to anyone who looks into these “networks” that they represent the Fortune 500, answer to no one, and apply the rule of law as an arbitrary reflection of their self-serving interests subject to change upon a political whim. Despite Slaughter’s enthusiasm for a “New World Order,” in reality it is the recipe for a corporate fascist planetary regime and constitutes the greatest threat to humanity.


Cartalucci goes on..

Slaughter begins a recent Atlantic article titled “The New Foreign Policy Frontier” by citing “corporations, foundations, NGOs, universities, think tanks, churches, civic groups, political activists, Facebook groups, and others” as the new frontier of foreign policy. She then goes on to state that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “insists that 21st century diplomacy must not only be government to government, but also government to society and society to society, in a process facilitated and legitimated by government.” Slaughter continues by saying, “that much broader concept opens the door to a do-it-yourself foreign policy, in which individuals and groups can invent and execute an idea — for good or ill — that can affect their own and other countries in ways that once only governments could.”

Slaughter goes on to use the “Arab Spring” as proof positive the new foreign policy paradigm is effective. She mentions her two days spent at the corporate-funded Personal Democracy Forum, which included bloggers and organizers from the contrived “Arab Spring.” She notes that other participants included “government officials, corporate executives, and the civic sector.” She claims the six months of unrest in the streets as a result of this “new foreign policy” has accomplished more than 30 years of traditional “foreign policy.”

Are we getting the picture? Just like ol' Norman Dodd said before he died, the first minutes of the Carnegie Foundation (1908) listed getting control of the State Department as a top priority. As we're discovering in my Wall Street and Bolshevik Revolution study, this occurred rapidly during WW1. These Foundations were the subject of the Reece Committee that Mr. Dodd was the lead investigator on and chief counsel Rene Wormser wrote the definitive book on. So we've got this woman who has written a book called A New World Order in which she envisions the government-corporate-foundation complex ruling the world. Don't like it? Doesn't sound like you've had enough public schoolin' boy, don't worry, you'll get your mind right... So here's my representation of Ms. Slaughter - some of these connections may not be current, but it shows what she's into:
Ok, we see that she's got CFR, Trilateral and State Dept cred. She's of the liberal persuasion, but this is key: stop thinking of people as leftists or conservatives, start thinking in terms of collectivist/globalist vs. free men. Ok? Newt Gringich is just as into all this stuff as she is; he's just a different flavor to get that half of the country to go for it under the guise of "privitization" by these huge mulitnational corproations, because businesses can't be eeevill right? What if their run by collectivists, like Mrs. Slaughter who dream and actively work toward a world without national sovereignty or individual rights? We're screwed, that's what it means

But lets look at those NGOs on the left in more detail. Chances are, you've never heard of them, so lets take a look at who's funding them and what they hope to accomplish.

Inter-American Dialogue
This group consists of only 100 members chosen from the Western Hemisphere to talk about globalization. Its newest member is the Mayor of San Antonio, who probably doesn't realize what he's been asked to join. He probably thinks he just got a great club to put on his resume and doesn't think he's contributing to the problem of eroding national sovereignty. When they get done with him, it might be a different story. Let's look at the funding sources:

Foundations and Corporations
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Christopher Reynolds Foundation
Ford Foundation
Henry Luce Foundation
Open Society Institute
Tinker Foundation
Organizations
Corporation Andina de Fomento (CAF)
Inter-American Development Bank
International IDEA
Organization of American States
Pan American Development Foundation United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDF)
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Governments
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)
Embassy of Chile
Embassy of Guatemala
Embassy of Mexico
Government of Mexico
Inter-American Foundation
Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA)
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) 

So we got some George Soros money here courtesy of the Open Society Institute, the Ford Foundation, where Obama's mama used to work for Timmy's daddy, Pete Geitner, the UN, and all our other globalist organizations. If you research their funding, I wouldn't be surprised to find the banksters (Citigroup, Bank of America, etc.) as corporate sponsors.


Foreign Policy Foundation
Where did this thing come from? Oh, they give us a video narrated by Tom Brokaw:


Formed from the group hanging around Woodrow Wilson, huh? Obviously people of quality. Check out my post on the Establishment here to get started understanding the Inquiry.

Their Great Decisions program is an educational program that focuses on spreading globalization. Notice how they say how non-partisan they are, that's because the push to break down our Constitution has been a bi-partisan effort. As Carrol Quigley said, the two-party system is an illusion to keep the American's people energy diverted onto the fruitless effort of "throwing bums" out only to be replaced by equally globalist bums.


New America Foundation
This organizaiton was founded in 1999 by this pretty boy Ted Halstead. Its current Board of Directors is chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google fame. A lot of flowery language over there, but its just globalism, you'll not find any hoorays for the Founders or patriotic images. There's a lot of liberal bull on their education issues page. One example is "Promoting Mental Health in Young Children via Teacher Training". They also have toolkits for the classroom. Do not think that the teacher has control of what is being taught. Basically, they're told to repeat a script out of a binder. These groups will try out new stuff in select schools. Anyway, new teachers are observed to make sure they're following the script, you see. This is how they interject the green, commie agenda into even the most conservative areas, it comes in these toolkits that are attached to grant money. Please read the free online book, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by former Reagan Dept. of Ed official Charlotte Iserbyt for the definitive accounting of the demise of American Education.

Getting back to Anne-Marie, this woman is just an example of what is going on. Some have estimated that there are approximately 6,000 "Insiders" who are working toward the goal of world government. If you think that you can been them by boycotting McDonalds, you're not seeing the whole picture. I hope to post in the coming weeks real solutions to undermine their evil, anti-individual plans.

Notice how she promotes "democracy" as the plays the part of the "liberal" in this Colbert Report clip. This is globalist code for them controlling things. We live in a republic, something totally different. Watch this woman and Colbert play the dialectic like a cheap violin. Let's go to  China like Nixon did, huh? Well, that started a wonderful chain of events, did it not?


Well, I know that was a lot of information, but I want to get across that everything is not as it seems. Did you think that Muslims all over just got out of bed one day and said it's a good day to revolt? We know now that Ms. Slaughter and her ilk have set things in motion so to bring order out of their controlled chaos. It may be coming to our country soon.

Cross posted at Don't Tread on Us

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Color Me Green - Crayola Propoganda

So I recently purchased some crayons at the local back-to-school sale. I stockpile A LOT of crayons because you know they're going to loose or eat them over time, right? Well, I was helping my 3rd grader with her 2+3+R=10 kind of problems using crayons to illustrate. While I'm waiting for her to compute things, I'm looking at the back of the box which says:

* Made with solar energy! Solar panels provide enough energy to make one billion crayons each year. Starting Spring 2011, additional panels provide energy to make a half a billion markers in the USA.

Crayola Eco-Evolution
Here are some of the ways Crayola is conserving energy and making the products you love in a more environmentally friendly way:
A new tree is planted for every one used to make our colored pencils.
Using recycled plastic in our markers keeps hundred of tons of plastic out of the landfills each year.
To learn more about other ways Crayola colors are getting greener all the time, go to Crayola.com.

I know what you're thinking..What's the big deal? Are you against solar panels and conservation? No, I think those things are great, but the angle I'm looking at is how kids are bombarded with this green stuff all day, everyday of their little lives. When my daughter when to public school, science was all about pollution and compost. To contrast, the Apologia Homeschool science curriculum has elementary aged kids memorizing the taxonomic classes of the animal kingdom and the like. You know, real science.

It's Orwell's world we're living in and you know that green is the new red, right? So I went to investigate who owns Crayola to see what the interlock might be. Well, the parent company of Crayola is Hallmark, that's right one of the companies where Herman Cain is on the board of directors. What you take away from this is that there is considerable interlock between the board members of Hallmark and board members at some of these Fortune 500 companies you see to your right. Stupid map thing is not saving right, so I don't have a link, but the other thing I discovered was that two of Hallmark's former CEOs and a board member are affiliated with the Midwest Research Institute, which has now changed its name to MRI Global to be more fashionable. And buddy, are they all about the green. They have recently bought a great deal of office space in North Kansas City, and do a lot of contract research for the United State Government. William Hall of Hallmark family fame, is the Chairman of this nonprofit's board. So there's your answer as to why Crayola is trying to color our kids green.


Households Like Mine

I found this little toy at the New York Times via The Political Commentator that lets you see how many other households in America are like yours. My husband said to me once not too long ago that we're different. I kind of brushed it off, and he's like, no we're really, really different.

Like Mark Steyn says, the future belongs to those who show up for it.

Navy - A Force for Global Good

Here's a screen shot of the current U.S. Navy website. In case you're one of those old-timers who think that the armed forces should be used to "defend" the United States and not the entire world.

I feel like I'm living in a horrible sci-fi movie and can't change the channel. If you're new to this site, or wondering where I'm going with this, check out my disarmament post here. Also consider what we've been studying concerning the money changers that run the Federal Reserve, the IMF, and the Bank of International Settlements. With their counterfeit money, they've been able to build up this military with the support of the American people who live under the delusion that their military is going to protect them from tyranny. Meanwhile, Mexican gangs armed by that same United States Government wreak havoc on the Southwestern US. There's a reason why Jesus Christ went ape on the money changers and there's a reason that the Bible gives us hope with the following verse:
And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

-Micah 4:3
Learning war is an active phrase I gleaned there. If you've been following my Wall St. and Bolshevik series, we're learning that certain events were set into motion. It would not at all surprise me to further learn that certain persons have been "learning" how to keep war going as it is the most profitable business in the history of the world.

Anyway, let's cheer up!

Rick Perry Makes Joseph Farah Feel Unclean

Found this out via Vox Day, that Joseph Farah had been supporting Rick Perry because he actually bought into all that social conservative jive that Perry has been pushing. But come to find out, Rick Perry is A-OK with queer marriage in NY according to his remarks at another one of our hallmark nonprofit elite institutions, the Aspen Institute.
"Our friends in New York six weeks ago passed a statute that said marriage can be between two people of the same sex," explained Perry. "And you know what? That's New York, and that's their business, and that's fine with me. That is their call. If you believe in the 10th Amendment, stay out of their business."--Rick Perry
Joseph Farah argues that if we can't get together on what marriage is, all is lost. I would contend that the government has no business saying who's married and not, the proof is in the pudding - does the marriage produce fruit? That was the old-fashioned way of looking at it. Newsflash: Fruits can't produce fruit.

Government got into the marriage business when the collectivist/progressives hijacked our country and wanted to micro-manage our lives. The only benefit to marriage to the secularists that run things is that it gives you tax advantages. If there were not a communist progressive tax system in our country, I doubt queers would be so gung-ho to get married.


Anyhoo, Vox predicts that Rick Perry will be the second coming of Fred Thompson, who you'll recall was hyped a lot in this stage of the game. Farah concludes his honest and humble column by saying:


Evidently I was fooled by Rick Perry.
I freely admit it.
I feel unclean for the nice things I have said about him to date.
Forgive me.
It's ok, Joe, better figure this out now than later.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Rick Perry - The Establishment's Ace in the Hole

May I introduce you to this fine product:
We'll all need Rosetta Stone if Rick Perry is Elected President
That's because we'll all need to speak Spanish in order to get along in the new North American Union that Rick Perry has allowed to progress in his state. He's not going to come out and boldly say that he is leasing our highways out to foreign countries, that wouldn't be a politically viable move, would it? Rick Perry has worked hard for his globalist masters to put in the Trans-Texas Corridor, which would have been a major step in dissolving the sovereignty of the three North American countries. From an old Jerome Corsi article:
In the hotly contested summer round of public hearings throughout Texas, strong local opposition was voiced to Perry's plan to build a 4,000-mile system throughout Texas over a 50-year period, removing in the process some 580,000 acres of land from public tax rolls and displacing an estimated 1 million Texans from their ranches, farms, businesses, and homes through eminent domain.
But all he has to do to get the idiots on board is talk tough and use words like "fed up" and "succession" and "yee-hah" and our publicly-schooled idiots will clap their hands and act like none of this stuff in his record exists. The pavlovian media masters wipe the whiteboard of the public memory clean once again and the conservatives of America act like something will actually be different this time, another Texan is in office, oh wait.... No that whiteboard has also been wiped clean, the last Republican did not get the federal government into every local school district's business and further socialize the health care program with a Medicare  prescription plan. No, that wasn't socialized medicine, baby steps, master, baby steps. So anyway, everything will be better with Perry as president, his name starts with a 'p', and president starts with a p, he's got alliteration going for him already. He's got real Texan boots, to boot out the liberals. yeah..
Yee- Hah!
The Rootin' Tootinest Conservative this Side of the Pecos!



The reason that I'm doing another Rick Perry post is that on the Instapundit poll, he's leading and I think that everyone who follows politics in the blogosphere ought to know exactly what they're supporting. Over at the Patriot Action Network, they'll tell you all 'bout former Al Gore campaign manager, Rick Perry  - some really disturbing information. A sizeable chunk of the TX population hates Rick Perry's guts and their opposition candidate gets a good chunk of the vote, but it's always split with the Democrat, always resulting in a Perry victory. Debra Medina got torpedoed with the charge of being a Truther, when all she said was that if the families want more of an investigation, they should get one. Which is exactly what Mrs. Sarah Palin said when asked about it, but she'll not get called a Truther. Why? I'm thinking she's going to be the Rick Perry running mate, to help all those conservatives who may be pausing at the rumors that ol' Rick isn't what he seems. Sarah will make it go down easier, to shut off the brain and pull the lever, or push the button.

But as a conservative woman, wouldn't you love to see another conservative woman in the White House? I would like to think I'm not so shallow as to vote for someone because they've got the same plumbing as me. I really want to like Sarah Palin, but unless she starts talking about the banking cartel that runs our country and is at the root of everything wrong - from funding the UN's Agenda 21 to the worldwide economic implosion, I'll know that either she's oblivious or is one of them. Either way, it ain't good.

What's this? I just found a copy of..

The Establishment Script Wizard

The part of Texas Governor should be played by a man not less than 6 feet in height and not completely butt-ugly. He should speak with a passable Texan accent.   Connecticut Yankees may need more training in this area should they wish to win the part.
The governor will be required to publicly appear "conservative" to maintain his position, do lots of photo-ops with firearms, act like a cowboy, always make a big deal of signing prolife legislation regardless of personal feelings, overall, do his best John Wayne impersonation. These little tricks of the trade will allow globalization and collectivization to advance into the United States with little or no impediment. Opponents who point out the leasing of highways to foreign corporations can always be marginalized as "kooks". We will ensure that this information doesn't make it into the Texan press by buying up outlets not in our control. No one will believe that our man would do such things as the public will always see him wrapping in the flag doing his best All-American boy impersonation. I know, I know, it is disgusting. But if we're patient, the mundanes will be at our mercy and we can stop dressing as one of them.
Here are my other Rick Perry posts:

Rick Perry is Bad News
Rick Perry Loves Illegal Immigration
Rick Perry is a Bold-Faced Liar

Monday, July 25, 2011

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: Chapter 4

Wall Street "Orchestrates" Revolutions all over the World

We start out by stating that at the beginning of WW1, there were two conglomerates that dominated American finance: Rockefeller's Standard Oil and Morgan's Banks. The Rockefeller Empire included the insurance companies, Equitable Life and Mutual of New York, the banking institutions, National City Bank,  United States Trust Company and Hanover National Bank. The Rockefellers also controlled the copper trust, tobacco trust, smelters trust and the entire petroleum industry. The Morgans: "were in steel, shipping, and the electrical industry; they included General Electric, the rubber trust, and railroads. Like Rockefeller, Morgan controlled financial corporations — the National Bank of Commerce and the Chase National Bank, New York Life Insurance, and the Guaranty Trust Company"

Ok, now that we have established that, let's look at what these two conglomerates did with their massive fortunes:

Revolution in Panama - 1910 

It is my contention that the representatives of this Government [United States] made possible the revolution on the isthmus of Panama. That had it not been for the interference of this Government a successful revolution could not possibly have occurred, and I contend that this Government violated the treaty of 1846. I will be able to produce evidence to show that the declaration of independence which was promulgated in Panama on the 3rd day of November, 1903, was prepared right here in New York City and carried down there — prepared in the office of Wilson (sic) Nelson Cromwell ....
-- Congressman Rainey, United States, House, Committee on Foreign Affairs, The Story of Panama, Hearings on the Rainey Resolution, 1913. p. 53.
Congressman Rainey went on to state that only ten or twelve of the top Panamanian revolutionists plus "the officers of the Panama Railroad & Steamship Co., who were under the control of William Nelson Cromwell, of New York and the State Department officials in Washington," knew about the impending revolution. The purpose of the revolution was to deprive Colombia, of which Panama was then a part, of $40 million and to acquire control of the Panama Canal.

Revolution in China - 1912
The best-documented example of Wall Street intervention in revolution is the operation of a New York syndicate in the Chinese revolution of 1912, which was led by Sun Yat-sen. Although the final gains of the syndicate remain unclear, the intention and role of the New York financing group are fully documented down to amounts of money, information on affiliated Chinese secret societies, and shipping lists of armaments to be purchased.
Revolution in Mexico - Paging Pancho

Fast and Furious ain't nothing new. 
Another case of revolution supported by New York financial institutions concerned that of Mexico in 1915-16. Von Rintelen, a German espionage agent in the United States, was accused during his May 1917 trial in New York City of attempting to "embroil" the U.S. with Mexico and Japan in order to divert ammunition then flowing to the Allies in Europe. Payment for the ammunition that was shipped from the United States to the Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa, was made through Guaranty Trust Company. Von Rintelen's adviser, Sommerfeld, paid $380,000 via Guaranty Trust and Mississippi Valley Trust Company to the Western Cartridge Company of Alton, Illinois, for ammunition shipped to El Paso, for forwarding to Villa. This was in mid-1915. On January 10, 1916, Villa murdered seventeen American miners at Santa Isabel and on March 9, 1916, Villa raided Columbus, New Mexico, and killed eighteen more Americans.


"Where he got the bread to go? There ain't nobody knows"
Well, now you do! Paid for a job well done.

Big time commie, Lincoln Steffens writes to the power behind the throne, Col House (10/6/16):
My dear Colonel House:
Just before I left New York last Monday, I was told convincingly that "Wall Street" had completed arrangements for one more raid of Mexican bandits into the United States: to be so timed and so atrocious that it would settle the election ....
Once in power in Mexico, the Carranza government purchased additional arms in the United States. The American Gun Company contracted to ship 5,000 Mausers and a shipment license was issued by the War Trade Board for 15,000 guns and 15,000,000 rounds of ammunition. The American ambassador to Mexico, Fletcher, "flatly refused to recommend or sanction the shipment of any munitions, rifles, etc., to Carranza." However, intervention by Secretary of State Robert Lansing reduced the barrier to one of a temporary delay, and "in a short while . . . [the American Gun Company] would be permitted to make the shipment and deliver."
 Ah, there's our ol' boy Lansing making sure things go right for our collectivists overlords.
The raids upon the U.S. by the Villa and the Carranza forces were reported in the New York Times as the "Texas Revolution" (a kind of dry run for the Bolshevik Revolution) and were undertaken jointly by Germans and Bolsheviks. The testimony of John A. Walls, district attorney of Brownsville, Texas, before the 1919 Fall Committee yielded documentary evidence of the link between Bolshevik interests in the United States, German activity, and the Carranza forces in Mexico. Consequently, the Carranza government, the first in the world with a Soviet-type constitution (which was written by Trotskyites), was a government with support on Wall Street. The Carranza revolution probably could not have succeeded without American munitions and Carranza would not have remained in power as long as he did without American help.
So much for "containment" of the evil communist, socialist order. The United States government facilitated the first soviet government in the world right next door. The irony is painful.

America's Foreign Policy Forever Changed in a Moment in Time

You've got to take note of this:
In August 1914 Europe went to war. Under international law neutral countries (and the United States was neutral until April 1917) could not raise loans for belligerent countries. This was a question of law as well as morality.
When the Morgan house floated war loans for Britain and France in 1915, J.P. Morgan argued that these were not war loans at all but merely a means of facilitating international trade. Such a distinction had indeed been elaborately made by President Wilson in October 1914; he explained that the sale of bonds in the U.S. for foreign governments was in effect a loan of savings to belligerent governments and did not finance a war. On the other hand, acceptance of Treasury notes or other evidence of debt in payment for articles was only a means of facilitating trade and not of financing a war effort.
On May 94, 1916, Ambassador Francis in Petrograd sent the following cable to the State Department in Washington for forwardin to Frank Arthur Vanderlip, then chairman of the National City Bank in New York. The cable was sent in Green Cipher and was enciphered and deciphered by U.S. State Department officers in Petrograd and Washington at the taxpayers' expense (file 861.51/110).
563, May 94, 1 p.m.
For Vanderlip National City Bank New York. Five. Our previous opinions credit strengthened. We endorse plan cabled as safe investment plus very attractive speculation in roubles. In view of guarantee of exchange rate have placed rate somewhat above present market. Owing unfavorable opinion created by long delay have on own responsibility offered take twenty-five million dollars. We think large portion of all should be retained by bank and allied institutions. With clause respect customs bonds become practical lien on more than one hundred and fifty million dollars per annum customs making absolute security and secures market even if defect. We consider three [years?] option on bonds very valuable and for that reason amount of rouble credit should be enlarged by group or by distribution to close friends. American International should take block and we would inform Government. Think group should be formed at once to take and issue of bonds . . . should secure full cooperation guaranty. Suggest you see Jack personally, use every endeavor to get them really work otherwise cooperate guarantee form new group. Opportunities here during the next ten years very great along state and industrial financiering and if this transaction consummated doubtless should be established. In answering bear in mind situation regarding cable.
MacRoberts Rich.

  1.  American International Corporation is a Morgan firm that these banks would funnel their international dealings through.
  2. The word guarantee refers to the Guarantee Trust Company, another tool to move money back and forth throughout this period of history.
  3. MacRoberts is Samuel MacRoberts, the VP at National City Bank
It would appear that the United States State Department is just a cheap secretary for these banksters. Hey boy, take down this message and telegraph it to our boy in DC, who then forwards to the "man" in NYC. Nice, huh? Well, someone spoke up about the legality of allowing private corporations to use the encryption services of the US State Department:

The basic reason cited by Francis for facilitating the cables is "the hope of consummating loan which would largely increase international trade." Transmission of commercial messages using State Department facilities had been prohibited, and on June 1, 1916, Polk cabled Francis:
842
In view of Department's regulation contained in its circular telegraphic instruction of March fifteenth, (discontinuance of forwarding Commercial messages) 1915, please explain why messages in your 563, 565 and 575, should be communicated.
Hereafter please follow closely Department's instructions.
Acting.
     Polk
At the end of it all, these cables still go through and we see a chain reaction of corruption that has given us the Stage IV case of tyranny we see today.

What Are You Up to, Olaf?

Olof Aschberg was the known as the Bolshevik Banker, owner of the the Nya Banken, and big buds with all of the bankster gang.
In the summer of 1916 Olof Aschberg was in New York representing both Nya Banken and Pierre Bark, the tsarist minister of finance. Aschberg's prime business in New York, according to the New York Times (August 4, 1916), was to negotiate a $50 million loan for Russia with an American banking syndicate headed by Stillman's National City Bank. This business was concluded on June 5, 1916; the results were a Russian credit of $50 million in New York at a bank charge of 7 1/2 percent per annum, and a corresponding 150-million-ruble credit for the NCB syndicate in Russia. The New York syndicate then turned around and issued 6 1/2 percent certificates in its own name in the U.S. market to the amount of $50 million. Thus, the NCB syndicate made a profit on the $50 million loan to Russia, floated it on the American market for another profit, and obtained a 150-million-ruble credit in Russia.
During his New York visit on behalf of the tsarist Russian government, Aschberg made some prophetic comments concerning the future for America in Russia:
The opening for American capital and American initiative, with the awakening brought by the war, will be country-wide when the struggle is over. There are now many Americans in Petrograd, representatives of business firms, keeping in touch with the situation, and as soon as the change comes a huge American trade with Russia should spring up.
 Olof funneled money to the Bolsheviks through Germany. Think about it, if there had not been a Bolshevik Revolution, we would not have had a "cold war" that was the pretext for the "necessary" and permenant armament industry.

Finally, Michael Furtell, who interviewed Olof Aschberg just before his death, concludes that Bolshevik funds were indeed transferred from Germany through Nya Banken and Jacob Furstenberg in the guise of payment for goods shipped. According to Futrell, Aschberg confirmed to him that Furstenberg had a commercial business with Nya Banken and that Furstenberg had also sent funds to Petrograd. These statements are authenticated in Aschberg's memoirs (see page 70). In sum, Aschberg, through his Nya Banken, was undoubtedly a channel for funds used in the Bolshevik Revolution, and Guaranty Trust was indirectly linked through its association with Aschberg and its interest in MacGregor Grant Co., New York, agent of the Russo-Asiatic Bank, another transfer vehicle.
Check out the rest of this chapter if you want the nitty gritty details of the money being moved from the banksters to Germany and on into Russia. What I found interesting was the bankster funding of Germany during WW1!


In 1919 the Senate Overman Committee also established that Guaranty Trust had an active role in financing German World War I efforts in an "unneutral" manner. The testimony of the U.S. intelligence officer Becker makes this clear:
In this mission Hugo Schmidt [of Deutsche Bank] was very largely assisted by certain American banking institutions. It was while we were neutral, but they acted to the detriment of the British interests, and I have considerable data on the activity of the Guaranty Trust Co. in that respect, and would like to know whether the committee wishes me to go into it.
SENATOR NELSON: That is a branch of the City Bank, is it not?
MR. BECKER: No.
SENATOR OVERMAN: If it was inimical to British interests it was unneutral, and I think you had better let it come out.
SENATOR KING: Was it an ordinary banking transaction?
MR. BECKER: That would be a matter of opinion. It has to do with camouflaging exchange so as to make it appear to be neutral exchange, when it was really German exchange on London. As a result of those operations in which the Guaranty Trust Co. mainly participated between August 1, 1914, and the time America entered the war, the Deutsche Banke in its branches in South America succeeded in negotiating £4,670,000 of London exchange in war time.
SENATOR OVERMAN: I think that is competent.
What is really important is not so much that financial assistance was given to Germany, which was only illegal, as that directors of Guaranty Trust were financially assisting the Allies at the same time. In other words, Guaranty Trust was financing both sides of The conflict. This raises the question of morality.
There are many more intricate details of the passing around of huge sums of money in this chapter, but knowing the limit of the average attention span, I'll not paste it all into this post. What I'm trying to accomplish here is point out those persons by name and deed who were leading the way for the socializing of the world. If you read the writings of this crowd, you see that a world socialist government is their end game. Each generation, and I do mean you can see where these people's grand-kids are today, and you  can better believe that they aren't paupers and are continuing a family tradition of maintaining control, no matter how surreptitiously. 


Knowledge is Power -Pass it On!
Related Posts with Thumbnails