Although the women of the United States are confined within the narrow circle of domestic life, and their situation is, in some respects, one of extreme dependence, I have nowhere seen woman occupying a loftier position; and if I were asked... in which I have spoken of so many important things done by Americans, to what the singular prosperity and growing strength of that people ought mainly to be attributed, I should reply, To the superiority of their women.
Get a load of Secretary of Defense Panetta saying "our goal would be to seek international permission and we would come to the Congress to inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress...."
Notice at the end, Panetta retorts that the President has the ultimate authority to deploy the military if the US is threatened. Hee, hee that's the office that the banksters always have locked down.
Yep, the true colors are coming out. Commie Red it would seem.
States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
Northern Alliance of Traitors and Oligarchs
Here's some Lou Dobbs and Judge Nap analysis:
Did you know that Panetta serves on the board of the New York Stock Exchange and was a former director of Zenith Insurance Company? Bet you didn't. They sure don't advertise those connections. If the media did, people's minds just might to start clicking on and realizing how interconnected these people are.
That's all I have for now. Isn't it a relief that our dear leaders care so much about keeping us "safe."
Not this kind of camp anyway. Previously, I told you how contractor KBR was getting taking bids for laundry, food services etc, from US citizens should a crisis arise and camps needed setting up. Taking that as a little bit of background, let's see what this document has to say about us here in the "homeland".
Via Infowars, they've pulled the best bits out of your typical verbose government manual. Full document here.
Let's just start with the intro:
I/R operations facilitate the ability to conduct rapid and decisive combat operations; deter, mitigate, and defeat threats to populations that may result in conflict; reverse conditions of human suffering; and build the capacity of a foreign government to effectively care for and govern its population. This includes capabilities to conduct shaping operations across the spectrum of military operations to mitigate and defeat the underlying conditions for conflict and counter the core motivations that result in support to criminal, terrorist, insurgent, and other
destabilizing groups. I/R operations also include the daily incarceration of U.S. military prisoners at facilities throughout the world.
This manual continues the evolution of the I/R function to support the changing nature of OEs. In light of persistent armed conflict and social turmoil throughout the world, the effects on populations remain a compelling issue. The world population will increase from 6 billion to 9 billion in the next two decades, with 95 percent of the growth occurring in the developing world. By 2030, 60 percent of the world’s population will live in urban areas. Coexisting demographically and ethnically, diverse societies will aggressively compete for limited resources.
The thrust of this manual is that it is going to be used primarily in the third world, but look at the goals of our military here: "reverse conditions of human suffering", "defeat threats that may result in conflict" and last but not least, "build the capacity of a foreign government to care for and govern its population". OOOOKKK. Each one of those could be its own post. Jesus Christ is coming to end human suffering, in the mean time, the church, which has been knee-capped by the Elites, is supposed to be doing that. Since when does the Constitution provide that our armed forces which were supposed to be protecting this huge country conveniently bounded by two of the largest oceans in the world out to defeat threats that MAY result in conflict? Oh, and is the US Military is also supposed to be getting the populations of the world ready to accept foreign governments? Geez, if that doesn't radicalize Muslims, I don't know what will! This is the nanny state on steroids, it will control your life cradle to grave not just in America, but the WORLD!! Ha ha, hee, hee, ho, ho, to the funny farm we go! That's just the first paragraph.
So now I hear that Ron Paul, lasseiz-faire economist extraordinaire is somehow in league with commie Soros over this Sustainable Defense Task Force which includes these people:
Ron Paul and fellow Republican Walter B Jones of NC along with Barney Frank and Dem Ron Wyden of OR represented a bipartisan effort to see what lurks in the Defense Department, which accounts for 25% of the Federal Budget. If you want to cut the Federal Government, you have to be willing to look at everything. So many honest people in the military and Defense Department are screaming to the world about the waste, but we just tell them to shut up and wave the flag harder.
I see some real amateurs out there freaking out because George Soros is affiliated with some of these think tank groups. Remember that you must always see how people are linked, because you can link anyone to Kevin Bacon with five degrees of separation.
There's no doubt that George Soros is heavily invested in the Defense Sector. What? You didn't know that? George Soros has been affiliated with the Carlyle Group, a topic I dealt with here.
So we've definitely got a lot of libs here, which is not surprising as they have been watching the Defense Department grow unchecked for years. The true believers would be excited to shrink the Defense Department. But what about Lawrence Korb, a former Joint Chief of Staff doing in this list, as a member of Soro's Center for American Progress??? And what's this Wheeler fellow a member of--the Center for Defense Information? Another liberal group looking to downsize the military with Anthony Zinni, former Commander in Chief, Central Command among its ranks? We've got a couple of Cato people there, too.
Let me just cut right to it and tell you what is going on here. Playas like Soros are keeping the liberal flames fired up with hopes of scaling back the war fever of American foreign policy. For one thing, this keeps one side of the population focused on this issue and the other half excited about vilifying that half. Meanwhile, the conservative half argues about scaling back the welfare state and domestic government while never questioning what's going on out of our borders or how much money is flowing overseas. While we little people quibble over non-issues (like who showed up a paid shill at a debate), these globalists are bleeding our country dry. Let's look inside Soros' mind shall we? He wrote the following books:
The Alchemy of Finance (1988) Opening the Soviet System (1990) Underwriting Democracy:Encouraging Free Enterprise and Democratic Reform Among the Soviets and in Eastern Europe (1991) Soros on Soros: Staying Ahead of the Curve (1995, with Byron Wien) The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered (1998) Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism (2000) George Soros on Globalization (2002) The Bubble of American Supremacy: Correcting the Misuse of American Power (2003) The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror (2006) The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What It Means (2008)
How much does he emphasize globalization? Listen up proles, you're not playing in the same ballgame as these people at all. They see the world as their oyster and are just arguing about how to best carve it up. Excuse me if I don't go on and on about how awful George Soros is, as I refuse to live in that kind of fearful, agitated mindset. I lump Soros in with the Rockefellers, Warburgs, and the rest of our Elite friends. I don't like them, and will continue to expose them.
I think that Ron Paul takes every advantage when it comes to reducing the Federal Government and that's why he joined up with liberals in an attempt to reduce the size of the Defense Department, the largest employer in the world, when you include contractors. This is how he got his historic partial audit of the Federal Reserve, the first of its kind since the Fed's inception. Of course, George Soros tentacles would be hanging off of the liberals, that goes with out saying.
Bottom line: the connection here is extremely weak.
Who's going to call this man a weak-kneed liberal?
He tells it like it is: the Defense Dept is another redistribution of wealth center.
Some are talking him up as Ron Paul's possible Defense Secretary.
Listen for mention of the Insiders, you know who they are: our bankster-cartel friends meeting at the Harold Pratt House.
It was on this day, 10 years ago that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was grilled before Congress on why $2.3 Trillion dollars of defense money was unaccounted for. To be fair, outrage at the sheer volume of money unaccounted for was bipartisan.
As I've said before, that money could really come in handy, but that's not the point is it?
Update: Donald Rumsfeld now says that any cuts in the Defense budget will precipitate another terrorist attack. Gee, Donny how much would that 2.3 trill have come to with interest if you hadn't have lost it? Here's the map on our man Rumsfeld, note that these corporations listed means he was on the board at some point or is on the board. TPTB always pay off their people with lucrative opportunities.
Curious to see the connections between our armament industry and our top military brass, I made a map entitled Joint Chiefs of Staff. You will have to probably click on the link and explore the map further. I have little snarky comments and quotes on there to further flesh out these connections. If you haven't read General Butler's War is a Racket, I strongly urge you to do so if you wish to understand why the defense budget accounts for such a huge of the US government's debt burden. Doesn't it seem like a huge conflict of interest when those advising on war declarations (as if we have those antiquated things anymore) stand to profit enormously from war? Just sayin'
No, I'm not talking about World War III, I'm talking about the illegal, unconstitutional, immoral, and secretive operations carried out in our name as Americans. Most Americans have absolutely no clue what is really going on behind the scenes with our foreign policy and the flow of money through the military-industrial complex, which eats a huge share of our federal budget each year. If you even suggest of cutting any part of it, you're accused of hating the troops. Well, honeychild, the troops aren't getting that money now, and it shouldn't be a thought crime to wonder where the trillions of dollars have gone.
Here is a video that puts pictures to excepts from a John Stockwell lecture. He was one of the first of the CIA agents to come out and tell it like he saw it. He was in charge of the Angola Task Force, which is where the military/industrial complex went to directly after Vietnam. You see, they fear a break in the action. They use fear to further their own profit motives. . The underwear bomber and the scanners is a classic example. They create the problem by having an agent escort a man who has spent the requisite amount of time in an Al-Qaeda camp to establish his terrorist bona fides onto an airplane. His pants explode. Solution: We'll scan or feel up everyone's naked bodies so that this doesn't happen again. Never mind the fact the powder wasn't dense enough to be detected, Rapiscan has to make some money for its parent company, OSI systsems, which is partially owned by George Soros, but I digress.
Throughout the last several decades, when it comes to foreign policy, it has been Dictator X is a communist. We say so. We don't want more communist countries, so we'll have to get rid of him and replace him with a democratic government. Looking back, we see that the governments overturned were not outright communists, except for maybe Cuba and it's still there. How about that? We also see that the people the US government put in as examples of democratic governments were anything but. They were often just as brutal, if not more so, than the preceding regime.
One thing I've learned from all this is that screwing America over is a nonpartisan endeavor. The agenda marches forward regardless of party. There have been very few in government who have stood up for the actual Constitution as written and intended. Wherever these braves souls have spoken up, they have been vilified and some have met with a premature demise.
Anyhow, here's a fun little video that takes excerpts from a John Stockwell lecture given in the 1980s. What he says has more meaning for us today than those attending his lecture 20 years ago.
Yes, this is old news, but seeing how our country is facing a huge budget problem, it seems like $2.3 Trillion dollars would come in handy. Remember what Dwight Eisenhower said about the Military Industrial Complex- it has to be watched closely. Well, it has not been watched at all - kinda hard to do when they can hide behind the label "classified". The Democrats hate the military I've always heard, but I've never heard how the the Republicans hate waste in the military. I guess they don't, my suspicion is that's where some of them have their honey pots.
So on September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld breaks the news that 2.3 Trillion defense dollars cannot be accounted for. Oopsie. Here's a copy of an independent audit looking at 1.1 Trillion of it.
Here's Robert Byrd asking Donald Rumsfeld how you can loose 2.3 Trillion dollars. Kinda pathetic response.
