Schizo Conservatism

That's what it's come down to, hasn't it? I used to be so proud to be a "conservative". In my juvenile world, Republicans were all about the Constitution and were going to reduce the government. Wow, that sure didn't happen. Now all we've got is backbiting and each one of the anti-Paul candidates has a big government record that would make FDR blush.

 But nooo, they're "conservative" in schizo-con land. In Schizo-Con Land, it is perfectly OK for the UN to tell our boys (and girls) where and when to fight, because our Congress will bow down to them and vote for the money. This money which flows from the Federal Reserve Cartel, whose members are unknown, but highly suspected to be Goldman Sachs and friends, is based on nothing and can be manipulated by persons unknown on a whim. If you don't like any of that, then you must be a communist liberal. Go take a bath you hippie!

via Mises

 Such is the mentality in Schizo-Con Land, where we all love rodeos, apple pie, old barns, and country music. And the UN! They'll tell you we need to kick out the UN and Agenda 21 while allowing the UN to dictate where our troops are sent. Support the troops and their UN orders!

Schizo Cons will also totally ignore any increases made in big government and will accept the complete ripping of the Constitution by someone as long as they sound and look OK on TV, and their mind minder like them.

 Did I mention how much we just ignore parts of the Constitution that contradict our mind control talk radio masters? We must beat whatever democrat is in power now or it is the end of the world. Our nation is under attack, by golly!! But sadly Schizo Cons have the attention span of a gnat so they can't follow a detailed explanation on how the money supply and war are intertwined to make slaves of us all. They just can't be bothered to think beyond the 2-D Candyland world FoxNews Mark(MellonBoy)Levin, Rush, and the rest of the clowns paint for them.

It's just painful to watch. It actually reminds me of the Francis Schaeffer classic, Escape from Reason, where rationality exits stage right.

Check out this great interview of Jack Hunter doing the Super Tuesday Post Mortem, wherein he more eloquently, yet accurately describes the state of the Republican Party today.

How to Escape Collectivism- Norman Dodd Explains

I'm sharing the Stan Monteith interview of Norman Dodd done in 1980. In case you are new here and haven't heard, Norman Dodd was the lead investigator on the Reece Committee of 1953, which investigated the tax exempt foundations and their progressive agenda.  Norman Dodd was an Ivy-League education banker, who had worked in high finance early in his career. He saw firsthand our nation's currency get exchanged for this "funny money". But what really struck out in this interview for me was his advice on how to escape the collectivist system by following the example of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Here is The Enemy Within, the interview starts halfway through at the 30 minute mark. The first 30 minutes is Dr. Stan setting the stage so the viewer will be conversant in the subject matter.

Luke 4:1-13

King James Version (KJV)

Luke 4

 ¹And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,

 ²Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered.

 ³And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread.

 ⁴And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

 ⁵And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

 ⁶And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.

 ⁷If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.

 ⁸And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

 ⁹And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence:

 ¹⁰For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee:

 ¹¹And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

 ¹²And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

 ¹³And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.

Application:

•  You shall not live by bread alone - Don't be afraid for your life or live in fear of God not providing, only 
• Devil offers Christ the world, surpassing any human offering-- don't be coerced by material things, they will not save your eternal life, the only one that matters. All of these internationalist one worlders have been influenced by material things and prestige. John Perkins has written from his personal experience how the "system" seeks out people who can be manipulated with money and power to serve in its ranks.
• Prove to everyone God is real-  Christians get this all the time from unbelievers wanting them to prove God's existence, but Christ is clear that we should not tempt God with parlor tricks, that's what the sorcerers of Egypt did and what the occultists like to do with their seances and Owojee boards.
• Bottom line: You cannot be corrupted if you are right with God. If you know that God holds your life in your hands, you can't be fearful when the NWO people like Cass Sunstein threatens to haul you off to a re-education camp. They prey on fear like a shark on blood, so don't let them have the satisfaction!

"One has to accept the realism of the inclusion of evil, and that in turn challenges the world of education to equip the student necessary to recognize evil in action within the sphere of his own experiences and refuse to be apart of it."--Norman Dodd

Why aren't you homeschooling yet!!

"This network cannot operate in the light and it acknowledges it."

So share this information with someone today.

Breitbart, Obits, and Coincidence

There is much speculation about the death of Andrew Breitbart. Why? Because of the piss poor way the news was broken to the American people. The words "death at 43" and "natural causes" do not go together in anyone's world. Yes, I have known people who dropped dead at age 39 of a sudden heart attack or stroke, but they don't put natural causes in the obit. As an interesting side note, this is what an obituary used to look like in this country:

Found Dead
Mrs. Ritter, Wife of Stephen N. Ritter
Found Dead in Her Bed at Her Home North of St. Louisville-Heart Trouble the Cause

St. Louisville, March 7 -- Mrs. Catherine Ritter, wife of Mr. Stephen N. Ritter was found lying dead in her bed at her home one mile north of this place, at an early hour this morning. Yesterday she did a big washing and was, apparently, in the enjoyment of the best of health. Heart disease is supposed to have been the cause of her death.
The deceased was aged 46 years, and was a woman who was universally respected by all who knew her. Ever ready to respond to the call of sickness or distress, she had won a warm place in the hearts of all her neighbors, and by them her many deeds of kindness will be remembered.
Four children, two married daughters and two sons, the youngest of whom is only eight years of age, besides the bereaved husband survive to mourn her death.

via the March 6, 1899 edition of the Newark Daily Advocate

In the future we're heading into obituaries will just say, "the following numbers have been deactivated".

Notice how the character of the person was described, how her death was discovered, etc. The person was young, but they explained the unexpected nature by heart disease, which has always been a silent killer.

What makes Andrew Breitbart different than Catherine Ritter of Newark is that he said that he was going to release video unflattering to Obama, paid actor for the Fed Cartel. And he boasted he was going to release it March 1. Well, he only lived 19 minutes into March 1, which makes anyone except the most Pollyanna of us suspicious to say the least. Even Jerome Corsi, noted scholar, former holder of extreme security clearance, has said that he thinks its fishy too. He said that Breitbart had just been talking to Sheriff Joe who has been seriously looking into Obama's eligibility. Not to mention how many hornet nests the man stirred up, especially those unions. That's why the coroner says they'll be going over it with a fine tooth comb.

Elsewhere, noted presidential impressionist Steve Bridges died March 3 at age 48. The cause of death is unknown at this time. What is known is that his work was not well taken at the Oval Office these days.

Well, that's my thoughts so far on this. Let's not let each other "disappear" with a shrug, but be watching out for each other. Liberty lovers are never suicidal, by the way...

Make 'Em Steal It!!!

You may have noticed the exuberance of Ron Paul supporters. There are many reasons for this, but one of them is the fact that Ron Paul supporters know what they're up against: the cutting edge in psychological warfare and every dirty trick the Establishment has to offer. Now some of you might not care about voting irregularities if it benefits your candidate, but know that if our votes are "lost", shot down the memory hole or not counted, then we truly do live in lawlessness. It's a big deal, and I'll just catalog some of what I've seen so far via the Daily Paul where someone has run some statistical analysis on this and came up with the following conclusions:

Hey guys. I just want you all to know that I have graphed in detail all of the counties in NH, SC and Fla that have the precinct information available on the Election Commissions' website. I have amassed a couple of hundred graphs probably. The most difficult part of this is getting this information into a form that is brief but easy to understand. Please appreciate this.There are surely exceptions to the following observations, but here are some generalities:

1. In any county where Ron Paul has more votes than Mitt Romney using the low vote total precincts, you get a ridiculous- looking curve like the one in Anderson County. (Anderson, Greenville, Spartanburg, and Oconee Counties). Mitt ends up at a vote total that could have been Paul's projected total and Paul crashes to the ground.

 2. In the counties where Romney has more votes than Paul in the low vote total precincts, There is no ridiculous anomaly like the one in Anderson County.

3. In any race where Newt is ahead of Romney and Romney is anywhere close to Gingrich in vote total, Newt gets flipped by Romney (Richland, Charleston, and Beaufort Counties in SC) much like the maneuver in Anderson County where Mitt flips Paul. It appears to me that Newt actually won these counties as well as Polk and Duval Counties in Florida. 

4. As I have laid out in my brief, fluctuations should occur in honest elections; however, these "flips" look to me like one candidate is suddenly losing his slope (established vote percentage) and another (Romney) is gaining at precisely the same percentage. My personal constitution screams to me "this phenomenon is not a normal occurrence!"

 5. In almost all Counties, Mitt Romney gains hundreds- even more than a thousand- in the very largest precinct(s). Many instances this tail end gain appears to serve the purpose of draining Ron Paul just enough to be last place. (example: Charleston County SC). I'm not saying there isn't an honest explanation, but I want to hear one... that makes sense. Maybe in every single county Romney supporters turned out in "droves" at the very largest precinct(s)?

 6. Most graphs follow a disturbing trend: Mitt Romney's vote percentage "line" looks more like a parabola curving upward and the other 3 candidates' lines like a parabola curving in the negative. This might could be explained in some honest way, but it looks like algorithms in voting machines to me. I invite intelligent discussion.

 7. Yes- demographics can play a part, of course. I am NOT a Demographics expert. I do like math though.

8. I will release a procedure that will show all of you math analysts how to do this on your own. You will see the same anomalies as I see.

If RP Vote = 7000
Then Mitt=RP Vote and RP Vote - Mitt

Don't forget the testimony of this computer programmer who says he was told to rig voting machines:

Maine:
Christian Science Monitor - Should Ron Paul demand a recount?
Remember that they would not count the last 15% of the precincts that Ron Paul was expected to win. This is the state that gives us the Senate sisters Snowe and Collins..

Nevada:
 GOP Chairwoman Tarkanian resigns day after caucus. Her husband is running for house, and I believed she planned it in advance.
Clark Co. - "excess" ballots counted
According to this lady, everyone in her precinct was voting for Paul

Iowa:
Iowa GOP Chairman resigns.
Votes counted in "secret" location
Missing Precincts are from ones that Romney lost in '08 - in college towns where RP was doing well.
Ron Paul leads in entrance polls

So if Ron Paul supporters where not giving it 110%, then the whole movement would be dismissed. That's one thing they can't say about us. We see what is happening to our country clearer than any other constituency, and this is a tremendous threat to our Elite overlords. They have no choice but to lie, cheat, and steal. So I say "make em steal it!", don't just allow them to take our nation to totalitarian town.

The Ron Paul campaign is the most tremendous political experiment in the last 100 years. What happens when you have a candidate who:

• is a professing Christian with a solid "walk", yet refuses to capitalize on the name of the Savior for political gain.
• is a "pro-life" OB-GYN who ran a medical practice while avoiding government lucre (Medicaid, etc.)
• has a plan to actually eliminate abortion in much of America by passing the We the People Act, giving the states jurisdiction over the abortion issue with a 51% majority in Congress. 
• has a track record of never voting for an unbalanced budget
• returns his Congressional office budget to the Treasury
• doesn't talk to lobbyists, go on junkets, or takes graft
• has a solid understanding of monetary policy, history, and founding principles
• is a military veteran, having served five years - the only candidate who has served
• has a foreign policy that has been praised by many, many intelligence officers and experts from the field (Robert Pape, Col. MacGregor, Michael Scheuer, Lt. Col. Anthony Schaffer, Robert Steele..
• has a view on Iranian bombs held by 16 Intelligence Agencies and the head of Mossad
• Update: how about the only candidate who has a written plan complete with arithmetic to cut ONE TRILLION DOLLARS out of the budget by ELIMINATING FIVE departments. I wonder why TPTB wouldn't want that..

I'll tell you what happens: people just can't recognize what they're seeing because they've been lied to for too long.

MUST SEE MITT: How to be the Prince of Welfare

That's what I call it when you explain with a power point presentation how to get the Federal Government to pay for everything you want to do. Mitt explains that all the money is in Washington and gives us easy steps to get the money out. And when I say we, I mean rich bankster types like him. In this video, he explains how he got the American Taxpayer to foot the bill for everything Olympics, including getting the Department of Education to shell out one million bucks for Olympic tickets for kids. This is just AMAZING to watch:

h/t Daily Paul

Wall Street and FDR: Chapter 9 - Corporate Socialists

CHAPTER 9

FDR AND THE CORPORATE SOCIALISTS

The Swope Plan

I think this is as revolutionary as anything that happened in this country in 1776, or in France in 1789, or in Italy under Mussolini or in Russia under Stalin.
Senator Thomas P. Gore in the National Recovery Administration Hearings, U.S. Senate Finance Committee, May 22, 1933.

That quote is essential in understanding when and how this country veered so far off course. In our last chapter, we examined the National Recovery Act, which FDR is credited with, however, this was written, as most laws in this country by other people for purposes withheld from the general public. We have so far traced the roots of corporate socialsim from FDR's great-grandpa, Clinton Roosevelt in 1841. We have learned that Bernard Beruch, who was also known in the correspondance as BM, was the architect of much of the NRA. But another player was Gerald Swope, President of General Electric and his Swope Plan, on which much of the NRA was based. After WW1, a similar plan was put in place for postwar Germany. Ironic that the Swope family was German, also. The Swope family was tight with BM and the whole New York gang. Get this:

Charlotte Iserbyt on Agenda 21

As some of you know, I'm a real Charlotte fan. Her work The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America is a tremendous tool to convince any doubter about the larger Communist conspiracy in this country. Newsflash: it didn't start with Obama, he's just one of their employees. Anyway, I wanted to share this tremendous interview with Charlotte where I've never seen her so fired up!

The schools system will be federalized, including the private schools. When a conservative talks up school choice, know right here and now that that issue has been co-opted by the communists by the conservatives, yes conservatives. Charlotte has some words to speak about the "conservative" organizations like Heritage. She blames them more than liberals for the Communism we see in America. Why? Because no one suspected them and on some level, these people knowingly go along to get along.

Also discussed is the deliberate take-down of the family, the Reece Committee, get involved locally, be on the lookout for Agenda 21 in your community. Also, get informed and pass it along. These one-worlder totalitarian types were hoping to take us out in the '70s she said, but some brave patriots fought for our right to be communicating right here and now. She also said that Ron Paul is the only candidate who can save our country.

If you haven't looked into some of the series on my blog, you really ought to check them out. Notice that I don't advertise, I don't make any money with this blog, I just want to do my part to alert people who love the Constitution and America as founded as to what is going on. So if you search it out somewhere else, that's ok too. Here are some entry points:

The Establishment: Naming Names and Tracing Their Roots
The Subversion Process
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution
Wall Street and FDR

So here is the interview, chock full of real information - I highly recommend it.

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4